Government Contractor Time Tracking Systems Best Practices

Government contractor time tracking systems

Your company modernized operations by implementing electronic timekeeping, eliminating paper timesheets and streamlining payroll processing. Employees swipe badges, managers approve time electronically, and your payroll integrates seamlessly with your accounting system. Then DCAA auditors questioned whether your electronic system actually meets government contract timekeeping requirements under FAR 31.201-4 and discovered your clock-in system tracks attendance but doesn’t capture the job costing detail, daily entry certification, or audit trail documentation proving labor charges to government contracts reflect actual work performed. Here’s what contractors miss about electronic timekeeping: modern technology provides efficiency and accuracy for payroll, but DCAA compliance requires specific capabilities proving time charged to government contracts is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Understanding how to configure electronic timekeeping for government compliance—or when to supplement attendance systems with purpose-built solutions—protects your contract portfolio while leveraging technology investments.

The Legal Framework Electronic Timekeeping Must Satisfy

DCAA timekeeping requirements stem from Federal Acquisition Regulation cost principles establishing that labor costs must be supported by adequate documentation. FAR 31.201-2 mandates reasonable costs, meaning labor charges must reflect actual time employees spent on contracts, not estimates, averages, or statistical distributions. FAR 52.232-7, the Payments under Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts clause, creates specific requirements that contractors maintain and make available time records supporting labor charges—requirements enforced through DCAA audit procedures detailed in Contract Audit Manual Chapter 5.

The DCAA standard for timekeeping adequacy requires systems capturing six essential elements: daily time entry showing hours worked each day, charging to specific contracts or cost objectives reflecting actual work performed, employee certification attesting to time accuracy, supervisory approval confirming work performance, contemporaneous recording prohibiting after-the-fact reconstruction, and complete audit trails showing any corrections or changes. Electronic systems must deliver all six elements, not just convenient clock-in/clock-out functionality serving payroll needs.

Cost Accounting Standard 418, governing allocation of direct and indirect costs, reinforces timekeeping requirements by mandating that labor cost allocation must be based on actual causal relationships between work performed and contracts benefiting from that work. Your timekeeping system must capture information supporting cost allocation decisions—which means tracking work activities, not just attendance hours. When employees work on multiple contracts during a day, your system must record the specific distribution of time across those contracts, not apply allocation percentages after the fact.

What Contractors Must Understand About Electronic System Capabilities

Here’s what contractors miss about electronic timekeeping: badge swipe systems, biometric attendance tracking, and mobile clock-in apps excel at capturing when employees arrive and depart, but they rarely capture what work employees performed or which contracts benefited from their time. Your attendance system prevents time theft and ensures accurate payroll hours, but DCAA needs job costing information proving labor charges to government contracts reflect actual project work, not convenient cost allocation assumptions.

The daily time entry requirement creates the first major compliance gap in basic electronic systems. Many attendance platforms record weekly totals or allow batch time entry at week-end, violating DCAA’s mandate for daily contemporaneous recording. Understanding DCAA timekeeping requirements means implementing systems requiring employees to record time daily with system-enforced controls preventing submission delays. The requirement isn’t arbitrary—daily entry ensures accuracy by capturing information while fresh in employees’ minds, reducing errors from weekly reconstruction attempting to remember Monday’s activities on Friday afternoon.

Contract-level detail represents another critical capability gap. Your attendance system might track department, cost center, or general project codes serving internal cost accounting needs, but DCAA requires charging to specific government contracts with sufficient detail to support cost accumulation by contract line item, task order, or work package when your contracts require that granularity. Generic codes like “Government Work” or “Defense Projects” don’t satisfy compliance requirements when you’re performing multiple simultaneous contracts requiring separate cost tracking.

The certification and approval workflow separates compliant electronic systems from simple attendance tracking. DCAA requires employee certification—an affirmative statement that recorded time is accurate and represents actual work performed—plus supervisory approval confirming the employee actually performed the certified work. Electronic signatures satisfy these requirements when properly implemented with audit trails showing who certified, when certification occurred, and preserving original certified records. Badge swipes don’t constitute certification, and manager approval of payroll hours differs from supervisory certification of contract work performance.

DCAA compliance explained for electronic timekeeping means understanding these systems must deliver complete audit trails demonstrating compliance, not just efficient payroll processing.

Five Essential Steps for Electronic Timekeeping Compliance

Step 1: Implement Daily Time Entry with Mandatory Submission Controls

Configure your electronic timekeeping system requiring employees to record time daily with system-enforced submission deadlines preventing delayed entry. Deploy automated reminders notifying employees of unsubmitted timesheets before end of each workday, escalating to management alerts when employees approach deadline violations. Build system controls preventing payroll processing for employees with incomplete timesheet submissions, creating operational incentives ensuring compliance.

Design user interfaces making daily time entry simple and intuitive—compliance fails when systems create unnecessary complexity discouraging daily submission. Mobile-responsive platforms enabling employees to submit time from any device eliminate “I was away from my desk” excuses preventing daily entry. The goal is making daily compliance easier than delayed reconstruction.

Establish exception procedures for legitimate situations requiring retroactive time entry—travel, illness, system outages—with mandatory management approval and documented business justification for each exception. Track exception frequency by employee identifying individuals requiring additional training or supervision ensuring consistent daily entry compliance.

Step 2: Deploy Contract-Level Job Costing with Activity Detail

Build electronic timekeeping with hierarchical charging structures enabling employees to record time to specific contracts, then task orders or contract line items, then work activities or labor categories as your contracts require. Create dropdown menus or search functions helping employees quickly locate correct charge codes without memorizing complex numbering systems. Validate charge code availability preventing employees from charging to closed contracts or unauthorized accounts.

Implement favorite or frequently-used contract lists enabling employees to access their primary charge codes quickly while maintaining ability to search full contract listings for occasional charges. Balance ease of use with system controls ensuring proper cost accumulation supporting contract requirements and DCAA audit procedures.

Deploy activity code capabilities when your contracts require distinguishing between engineering, manufacturing, testing, or other work activities within single contracts. This detail supports earned value management, technical performance assessment, and cost allocation verification during audits demonstrating labor charges align with contract deliverables and technical progress.

Step 3: Create Electronic Certification and Approval Workflows

Implement electronic signature capabilities meeting legal standards for binding attestations including user authentication, tamper-evident record preservation, and audit trail maintenance showing certification dates and any subsequent modifications. Build certification language into timesheet submission workflows requiring employees to affirmatively acknowledge accuracy before system acceptance—passive submission without certification doesn’t satisfy DCAA requirements.

Deploy supervisory approval workflows routing submitted timesheets to appropriate managers based on organizational structure, project assignments, or contract requirements. Create approval dashboards showing managers pending timesheets requiring review with aging indicators highlighting items approaching deadline for timely approval. Build escalation procedures routing unprocessed approvals to higher management preventing approval bottlenecks delaying payroll or contract billing.

Establish periodic recertification requirements for previously approved timesheets when significant changes occur—contract modifications, rate adjustments, or error corrections—requiring fresh management review and approval confirming continued accuracy after modifications. Maintain complete audit trails showing original submissions, all modifications, and resulting approvals demonstrating system integrity.

Step 4: Establish Comprehensive Audit Trail and Change Documentation

Configure electronic systems maintaining complete transaction histories capturing original time entries, all modifications with date/time stamps, user identification for every action, and business justification for changes requiring approval. Build system architecture preventing unauthorized deletion or modification of historical records ensuring audit trail integrity for required retention periods extending minimum three years after final contract payment.

Implement change control procedures requiring documented justification for timesheet corrections with approval workflows scaled to correction significance—small clerical errors might require supervisor approval while material changes affecting contract charges require management review and documented business rationale. Create correction reports monitoring frequency and patterns identifying potential compliance issues or training needs.

Deploy automated backup systems ensuring audit trail data protection through redundant storage, disaster recovery procedures, and retrieval capabilities enabling DCAA auditors to access historical records efficiently without requiring manual reconstruction or supplemental documentation development.

Step 5: Build Integration Between Timekeeping and Job Costing Systems

Create seamless integration feeding approved timesheet data directly into project accounting and job costing systems without manual intervention, allocation formulas, or statistical distribution. When employees record 8 hours to Contract A, your job costing must charge exactly 8 hours of that employee’s labor rate to Contract A—zero tolerance for disconnects between timekeeping and cost accounting.

Implement reconciliation procedures comparing timesheet system totals to job costing labor accumulation by employee, project, and accounting period. Investigate any variances immediately requiring root cause analysis and corrective action before variances accumulate into systematic problems discovered during DCAA audits. Monthly reconciliation demonstrates system integration integrity while identifying interface failures requiring immediate correction.

Establish validation controls preventing cost accounting system acceptance of labor charges lacking proper timesheet support—no manual labor entries, no allocation percentages, no after-the-fact distributions circumventing timekeeping records. These controls enforce fundamental requirement that labor costs charged to government contracts must flow from approved timesheet documentation.

The Investment in Compliant Electronic Timekeeping

Implementing DCAA-compliant electronic timekeeping systems costs between $15,000 and $45,000 for small to mid-sized contractors depending on user count, integration requirements, and existing technology infrastructure. Purpose-built solutions like Hour Timesheet deliver required capabilities at price points accessible for small businesses while enterprise implementations requiring custom ERP integration may reach higher investment levels. Annual subscription costs typically range $3,000 to $12,000 based on user licensing and support services.

Let me show you the value: contractors with compliant electronic timekeeping systems process payroll more efficiently, reduce administrative burden on employees and managers, generate reliable job costing data supporting project management decisions, and demonstrate professionalism to DCAA auditors through systematic compliance rather than scrambling to reconstruct documentation during audits. Your timekeeping investment supports both operational efficiency and regulatory compliance—dual value justifying the expenditure.

Contractors with inadequate electronic systems face audit findings requiring costly manual timesheet reconstruction, questioned costs when labor charges can’t be supported by adequate documentation, and competitive disadvantages when accounting system deficiencies appear in past performance evaluations affecting source selection. The cost of inadequate timekeeping extends beyond immediate audit impacts to affect future contract opportunities through damaged reputation with government customers.

Understanding Timekeeping Requirements Across Federal Agencies

DCAA timekeeping standards apply uniformly across all federal agencies and contract types. Your electronic system must satisfy identical requirements whether supporting Department of Defense contracts, NASA programs, Department of Energy work, or civilian agency agreements. The six essential elements—daily entry, contract detail, certification, approval, contemporaneous recording, and audit trails—create national compliance standards eliminating agency-specific variations.

Fixed-price contracts require the same timekeeping rigor as cost-reimbursement contracts when fixed prices were established using cost or pricing data or when contract modifications require equitable adjustment calculations based on actual costs incurred. Time-and-materials contracts face enhanced scrutiny because labor hours directly drive contract payments. Your electronic timekeeping must serve all contract types in your portfolio through consistent compliance approach.

Your Path to Electronic Timekeeping Success

The electronic timekeeping landscape rewards contractors who implement purpose-built solutions designed specifically for government contractor compliance rather than adapting commercial attendance systems serving different business needs. DCAA auditors evaluate system capabilities against regulatory requirements, not technology sophistication—your $100,000 attendance platform receives identical scrutiny as contractors using $10,000 specialized government contractor systems.

For contractors seeking electronic timekeeping combining operational efficiency with DCAA compliance, Hour Timesheet provides purpose-built solutions delivering all six essential elements auditors require. Our platform enforces daily time entry, captures contract-level detail with activity tracking, implements certification and approval workflows, maintains comprehensive audit trails, and integrates seamlessly with major accounting systems feeding approved time directly into job costing.

Your timekeeping system represents the foundation of government contract cost accounting. Build that foundation on compliant technology serving both operational needs and regulatory requirements.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

International Contract Compliance: What You Must Know

Your international expansion strategy looked perfect on paper—establish a lower-cost engineering center in Eastern Europe, leverage manufacturing expertise in Southeast Asia, and tap research talent in your Canadian subsidiary. Then DCAA auditors arrived requesting access to your foreign subsidiary records, demanding timekeeping documentation from your overseas employees, and questioning cost allocations involving international affiliate transactions. Here’s what contractors miss about international operations: DCAA’s audit authority and FAR cost principles don’t stop at U.S. borders. When you charge costs from international operations to U.S. government contracts, those costs must satisfy identical compliance requirements as domestic operations—regardless of foreign subsidiary locations, local business practices, or international accounting standards. Understanding how to maintain DCAA compliance across international operations isn’t optional for global contractors—it’s essential for protecting your entire federal contract portfolio.

The Legal Framework Extending Compliance Internationally

Federal cost accounting requirements apply to all costs charged to U.S. government contracts regardless of where those costs originate geographically. FAR 31.201-2 establishes that allowable costs must be reasonable, meaning they reflect what a prudent businessperson would incur under comparable circumstances. This reasonableness standard applies equally to costs incurred in California and costs incurred in Bangalore—your business justification for international cost structures must satisfy identical scrutiny DCAA applies to domestic operations.

FAR 52.215-2, the Audit and Records clause included in solicitations and contracts, grants DCAA access to “books, documents, papers, and records” supporting costs charged to government contracts. This access right extends to records maintained by subcontractors, affiliates, and subsidiaries when those entities generate costs flowing to government contracts. Your foreign subsidiary’s timekeeping records, payroll documentation, and cost allocation methodologies fall within DCAA’s audit scope when your prime contract includes costs from international operations.

The critical regulation international contractors must understand is FAR 31.205-26, governing material and services costs including requirements for intercompany transactions. When you purchase services from your foreign subsidiary or acquire materials through international affiliates, these related party transactions must demonstrate arm’s-length pricing equivalent to what you’d pay unrelated vendors for comparable items or services. The regulation creates specific documentation requirements proving international affiliate costs charged to government contracts reflect market-based pricing rather than convenient cost allocation schemes.

What International Contractors Must Navigate

Here’s what contractors miss about international compliance: foreign subsidiaries operating under local accounting standards, labor laws, and business practices still must generate records satisfying U.S. government cost accounting requirements when their costs support federal contracts. Your Polish engineering center might follow Polish labor regulations and EU accounting directives, but when Polish engineers charge time to U.S. Defense contracts, their timekeeping must satisfy DCAA standards including daily entry, employee signature, supervisory approval, and prohibition of after-the-fact reconstruction.

The timekeeping challenge gets complicated by time zones, language barriers, and cultural differences in work hour documentation. Many countries use monthly timesheets, flexible work hour systems, or trust-based time reporting completely incompatible with DCAA requirements for contemporaneous daily time entry. Understanding DCAA timekeeping requirements means implementing systems ensuring international employees follow identical timekeeping standards as domestic employees—regardless of local business norms or foreign labor regulations.

Transfer pricing creates the most complex compliance challenge for international operations. When you charge U.S. government contracts for services performed by foreign subsidiaries, DCAA examines whether your intercompany billing rates reflect arm’s-length pricing. If your German subsidiary charges $150 per hour for engineering services your U.S. operation performs at $120 per hour, you need detailed justification explaining the pricing differential through skill level differences, specialized expertise, or market rate variations. Without proper documentation, DCAA presumes the lower domestic rate represents reasonable pricing, disallowing the $30 per hour premium on foreign subsidiary labor.

Material costs sourced internationally face particular scrutiny regarding price reasonableness and proper customs valuation. When you import components from overseas suppliers—especially when those suppliers are affiliated entities—your cost accounting must demonstrate competitive pricing through market research, alternative supplier quotations, or independent cost analysis. The fact that your Chinese manufacturing affiliate is the only source for certain components doesn’t eliminate your obligation to prove pricing reasonableness through benchmarking against comparable items or detailed cost buildup analysis.

DCAA compliance explained for international operations means building documentation systems that bridge U.S. regulatory requirements and foreign operational realities, creating compliant cost accounting while respecting local legal constraints and business practices.

Five Essential Steps for International Contract Compliance

Step 1: Implement Global Timekeeping Standard Operating Procedures

Deploy uniform timekeeping systems and procedures across all locations performing work on U.S. government contracts—domestic and international. Your timekeeping policies must establish identical requirements for time entry frequency, approval workflows, and record retention regardless of employee location. Create detailed guidance translated into local languages explaining DCAA timekeeping requirements and why these standards supersede local business practices when employees work on federal contracts.

Implement DCAA-compliant timekeeping systems with cloud-based access enabling international employees to submit daily time entries with real-time synchronization to your central cost accounting systems. Technology eliminates geography as an excuse for compliance failures—your Polish engineers can submit daily timesheets as easily as your Virginia engineers when you provide proper systems and training.

Establish monthly compliance audits reviewing international employee timekeeping for DCAA requirement adherence including daily entry verification, signature completeness, and supervisory approval documentation. Early identification of compliance gaps enables corrective training before DCAA auditors discover systematic violations affecting multiple accounting periods.

Step 2: Create Comprehensive Transfer Pricing Documentation Systems

Develop detailed transfer pricing policies establishing methodologies for all intercompany transactions between U.S. prime contractors and international subsidiaries or affiliates. Your policies must define pricing bases (cost-plus, market-based, comparable uncontrolled price), document markup percentages with supporting market analysis, and establish approval procedures for intercompany billing rate changes.

Maintain comprehensive comparability studies demonstrating your intercompany pricing reflects arm’s-length transactions through analysis of independent vendor prices, published labor rate surveys, or detailed cost buildup justifications. When your Singapore subsidiary charges engineering services to U.S. contracts, you need documentation proving those rates approximate what you’d pay unaffiliated Singapore engineering firms for comparable services.

Build automated systems flagging intercompany transactions for management review before costs flow to government contracts, ensuring transfer pricing complies with documented methodologies and current market benchmarks. Prevention through systematic controls beats retrospective justification when DCAA challenges international affiliate charges.

Step 3: Establish International Records Access Protocols

Create formal agreements with foreign subsidiaries and affiliates granting DCAA audit access to records supporting costs charged to U.S. government contracts. These access agreements must address potential conflicts with foreign privacy laws, data protection regulations, and local legal restrictions on information disclosure while ensuring DCAA receives documentation necessary for cost verification.

Develop procedures for providing DCAA auditors with international records including translation services for non-English documentation, currency conversion methodologies for financial records, and explanatory context for foreign business practices affecting cost accounting. Proactive transparency builds auditor confidence in your international cost controls while satisfying regulatory access requirements.

Implement secure data sharing systems enabling DCAA auditors to review international subsidiary records without requiring physical travel to foreign locations. Cloud-based document repositories with controlled access streamline audit processes while maintaining appropriate confidentiality and security controls over sensitive business information.

Step 4: Deploy Foreign Exchange and Currency Conversion Controls

Establish systematic procedures for converting foreign currency costs to U.S. dollars using consistent methodologies compliant with GAAP and DCAA requirements. Your currency conversion policies must define exchange rate sources (Federal Reserve, OANDA, specific bank rates), timing of conversion (transaction date, month-end, contract-specific rates), and documentation supporting rate application.

Build accounting system controls automatically applying approved exchange rates to international subsidiary costs as transactions flow to U.S. prime contract cost pools, eliminating manual conversion errors and ensuring consistent methodology application. Create comprehensive audit trails documenting exchange rates used, conversion dates, and resulting U.S. dollar amounts supporting DCAA verification procedures.

Implement hedge accounting procedures when you use forward contracts or other instruments managing foreign exchange risk on international contracts. Hedge costs must be properly allocated to benefiting contracts through systematic methodologies demonstrating reasonable business practices and appropriate cost allocation principles.

Step 5: Create International Compliance Training and Certification Programs

Develop comprehensive training programs educating international employees about U.S. government contract requirements including timekeeping standards, cost allowability principles, and documentation obligations. Training must address cultural and business practice differences explaining why DCAA requirements supersede local norms when work supports federal contracts.

Establish annual certification requirements for international managers overseeing government contract work, confirming understanding of compliance obligations and commitment to maintaining required standards. Management certifications create accountability while demonstrating organizational commitment to international compliance.

Deploy ongoing compliance monitoring through quarterly reviews of international operations including timekeeping audits, transfer pricing verification, and documentation adequacy assessments. Systematic monitoring identifies compliance drift before violations accumulate into major audit findings requiring extensive corrective action.

The Investment in International Compliance Systems

Building robust international contract compliance systems costs between $125,000 and $275,000 for contractors with significant international operations depending on number of foreign locations, complexity of intercompany transactions, and existing system capabilities. This includes implementing global timekeeping systems, developing transfer pricing documentation, creating audit access protocols, and establishing compliance training programs. Annual maintenance typically runs $45,000 to $85,000 for ongoing monitoring and system updates.

Let me show you the value: contractors with excellent international compliance systems compete successfully for global programs requiring multinational performance, leverage international talent and cost advantages while maintaining government contract eligibility, and expand into commercial international markets using infrastructure built for government compliance. Your investment in international compliance systems creates competitive capabilities beyond regulatory requirement satisfaction.

Contractors without adequate systems face questioned costs on international subsidiary charges requiring contract price reductions, billing holds while you reconstruct transfer pricing justifications delaying cash flow for months, and competitive disadvantages in source selection when past performance evaluations note international compliance weaknesses. These consequences affect your entire contract portfolio—not just specific international programs.

Understanding DCAA’s Global Audit Jurisdiction

DCAA audit authority extends to all costs charged to U.S. government contracts regardless of where those costs originate globally. The agency maintains regional offices worldwide and coordinates with Defense Contract Management Agency International for audit support in countries with significant U.S. contractor presence. Your Munich subsidiary and your Manila operations face identical DCAA scrutiny as your Memphis headquarters when their costs support federal contracts.

Multi-national contractors must recognize that compliance requirements don’t vary by location—FAR cost principles, CAS requirements, and DCAA audit standards apply uniformly worldwide. You cannot claim local business practices justify non-compliance with U.S. government cost accounting requirements. The burden falls on contractors to implement systems ensuring international operations satisfy U.S. regulatory requirements regardless of conflicts with local norms.

Your Path to Global Contract Success

The international contract compliance landscape rewards contractors who build robust systems enabling global operations while maintaining regulatory compliance. DCAA respects contractors demonstrating systematic international compliance management through uniform policies, comprehensive documentation, and proactive audit cooperation across all geographic locations.

For contractors managing international operations supporting U.S. government contracts, Hour Timesheet provides cloud-based solutions enabling consistent DCAA-compliant timekeeping across global workforces. Our platform delivers the daily time entry, approval workflows, and audit trail capabilities international employees need while maintaining centralized compliance monitoring for management oversight.

Your international operations represent competitive advantages in technical capability and cost efficiency. Protect those advantages through compliance systems ensuring your global workforce supports rather than threatens your federal contract portfolio.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

Hour Timesheet Login – Find Your Login Page

New Login

Each Hour Timesheet account has its own custom domain as part of the login URL. Your login page follows this format:

https://[yourcompanyname].hourtimesheet.com

For example:

ABC Company would login at: abc.hourtimesheet.com
Smith Industries would login at: smithindustries.hourtimesheet.com
Johnson LLC would login at: johnsonllc.hourtimesheet.com

How to Find Your Specific Login Page

Check Your Welcome Email

When your Hour Timesheet account was first set up, you received a welcome email containing your unique login URL. Search your email inbox for:

Subject line: “Welcome to Hour Timesheet”
From: Hour Timesheet or support@hourtimesheet.com

Look at Your Bookmarks

If you’ve previously logged in and bookmarked your login page, check your browser bookmarks for your Hour Timesheet URL.

Ask Your Administrator

Your company’s Hour Timesheet administrator or the person who set up your account will have your unique login URL.

Check Previous Login History

Look at your browser history for “hourtimesheet.com” – your specific subdomain should appear in your recent browsing history.

First Time Logging In?

If you’re a new employee and haven’t received login credentials yet:

Contact your company’s Hour Timesheet administrator
They will provide you with:
- Your company’s unique login URL

Troubleshooting Login Issues

“This site can’t be reached” or “Page not found”

This usually means you’re using the wrong company subdomain. Double-check your company name in the URL.

Forgot Your Password?

Click the “Forgot Password?” link on your login page to reset your password. Password reset emails will be sent to your registered email address.

Can’t Remember Your Username?

Contact your company administrator or Hour Timesheet support for assistance.

Need Help? Contact Hour Timesheet Support

Our support team is ready to help you access your account:

Phone: (888) 780-9961

Email: support@hourtimesheet.com

Support Hours: Monday – Friday: 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM EST

When contacting support, please have ready:

Your company name
Your email address associated with Hour Timesheet
A description of the login issue you’re experiencing

Security Note

Hour Timesheet takes your data security seriously.

Your company data remains separate and secure
Enhanced access control
Better compliance with DCAA and government contracting requirements

Never share your login credentials with anyone outside your organization.

Still Can’t Find Your Login Page?

If you’ve tried the steps above and still can’t locate your Hour Timesheet login URL, please contact our support team immediately at (888) 780-9961 or support@hourtimesheet.com.

About Hour Timesheet

Hour Timesheet is DCAA-compliant time tracking software designed for government contractors and professional services firms. Whether you’re on a 30-day free trial or a long-time customer, we’re here to ensure you have seamless access to your timekeeping system.

Small Business Set-Aside Eligibility and Compliance

Small business certification requirements

Small business set-asides represent your competitive advantage in federal contracting—until a size standard violation transforms that advantage into a liability costing you the contract, future set-aside eligibility, and your company’s reputation. Understanding size standards isn’t just about calculating employee counts or revenue thresholds when you submit proposals. It’s about maintaining compliance systems proving you qualify for set-aside contracts throughout performance periods while tracking affiliation relationships, monitoring revenue growth, and documenting size determination supporting your small business status. Here’s what small business contractors need to know about maintaining set-aside eligibility—and how to build compliance systems protecting your competitive position.

The Regulatory Framework Governing Small Business Size Standards

Small business size standards derive from the Small Business Act, with implementing regulations at 13 CFR 121 establishing size determination methodologies, affiliation rules, and certification requirements that create enforceable compliance obligations. These aren’t guidelines—they’re regulatory requirements with legal consequences when contractors misrepresent their size status. FAR 52.219-1, the Small Business Program Representations clause included in solicitations, requires contractors to certify their small business status and creates contractor responsibility for representation accuracy under penalty of criminal prosecution for false statements.

The FAR goes further at 48 CFR 19.301-2, establishing that size status is generally determined as of the date of self-certification for the specific solicitation. But here’s what contractors miss: you must continue meeting size standards throughout the life of the contract in many circumstances, particularly for multiple-award contracts and when exercising options. Your size determination isn’t a one-time calculation—it’s an ongoing compliance obligation requiring systematic monitoring and periodic recertification.

13 CFR 121.103 establishes affiliation rules creating the most complex aspect of size determination. Your business isn’t evaluated in isolation—you must account for affiliated companies including parent corporations, subsidiaries, and entities under common control. The affiliation analysis requires understanding ownership structures, management relationships, contractual agreements, and economic dependencies that might create affiliation triggering size standard recalculation including affiliated company revenues or employees.

What Small Business Contractors Must Get Right

Here’s what contractors miss about size standard compliance: your NAICS code selection drives everything, and choosing the wrong code doesn’t just affect your competitive positioning—it affects your legal compliance status. Each NAICS code has specific size standards measured either by number of employees or average annual revenue over a three-year period. A software development contractor (NAICS 541511) with a $30 million employee-based size standard faces completely different compliance requirements than a systems integration contractor (NAICS 541512) with a $47 million revenue-based standard for the same technical work.

Revenue calculation gets complicated because you’re not just adding up invoices. 13 CFR 121.104 requires calculating average annual receipts including all revenue from all sources—government contracts, commercial work, international sales, and any income from investments or other business activities. You must use completed fiscal years, not partial periods, and account for affiliated company receipts when affiliation exists. Small businesses approaching size standard thresholds need systems tracking revenue in real-time with projections identifying when growth will trigger size standard violations.

Affiliation compliance creates the biggest trap for growing small businesses. You might have clean ownership with no parent company or subsidiaries, but affiliation can arise from contractual relationships with your vendors, teaming arrangements with your partners, or even investments from venture capital firms in your cap table. Here’s where compliance goes sideways: contractors form joint ventures to pursue contracts without understanding Joint Venture agreements themselves can create affiliation if structured improperly. That strategic partnership helping you win contracts might be destroying your small business status if the relationship creates affiliation under SBA rules.

Understanding DCAA compliance requirements for small businesses means building systems tracking not just your direct costs and labor hours but also your size determination components including revenue tracking, employee counting methodologies, and affiliation relationship documentation. These systems prove your eligibility when competitors challenge your size status or contracting officers request verification.

Five Essential Steps for Size Standard Compliance

Step 1: Implement Continuous Size Determination Monitoring Systems

Build automated systems tracking your size determination components on a monthly basis rather than calculating size only when preparing proposals. Create dashboards monitoring employee counts (including full-time equivalents for part-time workers as required by regulations), tracking revenue on a rolling three-year average basis, and projecting when growth trends will approach size standard thresholds. The goal is advance warning—you need to know six months before you’ll exceed size standards, not discover the problem after submitting a proposal certifying small business status you no longer hold.

Deploy timekeeping systems that support compliance tracking by accurately counting employees and calculating full-time equivalents required for employee-based size standards. Your timekeeping data should interface with size determination calculations providing real-time employee count accuracy supporting size certifications.

Step 2: Establish Affiliation Analysis Documentation Procedures

Create comprehensive documentation supporting your affiliation analysis including organizational charts, ownership structures, contractual relationship inventories, and management control assessments. When you certify small business status, you’re implicitly certifying you’ve performed adequate affiliation analysis and determined no affiliation exists requiring size standard recalculation. That certification requires supporting documentation demonstrating due diligence.

Develop systematic procedures reviewing all significant business relationships for potential affiliation implications including subcontractor agreements, teaming arrangements, joint ventures, investor relationships, and shared facility or resource arrangements. Maintain legal review of agreements before execution confirming relationships don’t create unintended affiliation violating size standards. DCAA compliance explained emphasizes documentation proving compliance rather than reconstructing justification after challenges arise.

Step 3: Create NAICS Code Selection and Validation Systems

Implement formal procedures for selecting appropriate NAICS codes for each opportunity with documented analysis supporting code selection. The NAICS code selection affects size standard thresholds, so incorrect code selection can inadvertently create size standard violations even when your business qualifies under the correct code. Maintain records showing how you determined the NAICS code based on the principal purpose of the solicitation and the predominant work you’ll perform.

Build systems ensuring consistency between NAICS codes used for size certifications and codes reflected in your accounting systems, capability statements, and marketing materials. Inconsistency creates questions about certification accuracy even when your selected code is technically correct. Document the rationale for any NAICS code changes between related procurements demonstrating legitimate business justifications rather than gaming size standards.

Step 4: Deploy Size Recertification Tracking and Management Systems

Create automated tracking systems monitoring recertification obligations for long-term contracts, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contracts, and multiple award vehicles. Many contracts require contractors to recertify size status upon option exercise, task order award, or at specified intervals. Missing recertification deadlines or failing to update size status when your business exceeds size standards creates compliance violations with serious consequences.

Implement calendar-based alert systems notifying appropriate personnel of upcoming recertification obligations with sufficient lead time to perform current size determination calculations, affiliation analysis, and management review before certification submission. Maintain comprehensive records documenting each recertification including the calculations performed, affiliation analysis conducted, and management approval supporting certification accuracy.

Step 5: Establish Size Protest Response Preparedness Procedures

Develop comprehensive size protest response procedures including pre-positioned documentation, rapid response teams, and legal counsel engagement protocols. Size protests typically have short response deadlines—you might have only 5 business days to submit a complete response to the SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals including all supporting documentation proving your size eligibility. You cannot build this documentation after protests arrive—you need systems maintaining protest-ready materials throughout the year.

Create quarterly size determination documentation packages including current calculations, affiliation analysis, NAICS code justifications, and supporting financial records organized for rapid submission. Conduct mock size protests annually testing your documentation adequacy and response procedures, identifying gaps before real challenges emerge. This preparation protects your competitive position and demonstrates the professionalism government customers value.

The Investment in Size Standard Compliance

Building robust size standard compliance systems costs between $25,000 and $75,000 for small contractors depending on business complexity, affiliation analysis requirements, and system integration needs. This includes developing monitoring dashboards, creating documentation procedures, training staff on size determination methodologies, and establishing quarterly compliance review processes. Annual maintenance typically runs $8,000 to $15,000 for ongoing monitoring and documentation updates.

Let me show you the value: small businesses maintaining excellent size standard compliance win protests when competitors challenge their status, maintain eligibility for set-aside contracts worth millions annually, and build government customer confidence in their business integrity. Contracting officers prefer working with small businesses demonstrating systematic compliance management—it reduces their administrative burden and protest risk.

Contractors without adequate systems face size determination protests that cost $50,000 to $150,000 to defend even when successful, require diverting management attention during critical proposal and contract performance periods, and create customer relationship damage regardless of final outcomes. Sustained size standard violations can result in suspension or debarment from federal contracting, False Claims Act liability for contracts performed while exceeding size standards, and criminal prosecution for false certifications under 18 USC 1001.

Understanding Small Business Program Jurisdiction

Small business size standards apply uniformly across all federal agencies through SBA regulations at 13 CFR Part 121, but agencies have flexibility in establishing small business contracting goals and implementing set-aside policies. Your size determination analysis is identical whether you’re pursuing Defense, NASA, civilian agency, or state and local government contracts using federal funds. The regulations create national standards eliminating geographic variation—a small business in California faces identical size standards as one in Virginia for the same NAICS code.

Multi-location small businesses must aggregate employees and revenues across all locations when calculating size. You can’t treat your West Coast division separately from your East Coast operations—size determinations require consolidated calculations including all business activities regardless of geographic distribution. This creates particular challenges for growing companies managing expansion while staying within size standards.

Your Path to Set-Aside Success

The small business set-aside landscape rewards contractors who invest in proper compliance systems demonstrating ongoing eligibility rather than treating size determination as a one-time proposal requirement. SBA Office of Hearings and Appeals decisions consistently favor contractors with comprehensive documentation supporting their size calculations over competitors making unsupported allegations.

Small business status represents substantial competitive advantage in federal contracting—agencies have statutory requirements to award percentages of contract dollars to small businesses, creating preferential treatment in source selection when you qualify. Protecting that advantage requires systematic compliance management proving your eligibility throughout your company’s growth trajectory.

For small business contractors managing size standard compliance while growing operations, Hour Timesheet provides tools supporting both compliance monitoring and operational efficiency. Our platform helps you track the employee data and revenue information feeding size determinations while maintaining the DCAA-compliant timekeeping government contracts require.

Your small business status is a competitive asset. Treat it like one by building systems that protect your eligibility while you grow.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

SBIR/STTR Phase II Accounting Requirements

SBIR STTR Phase II

SBIR and STTR Phase II awards represent a critical transition point where your innovative research concept moves toward commercialization—and where your accounting systems must evolve to handle increasingly complex cost tracking requirements. What worked for your $250,000 Phase I feasibility study won’t satisfy the cost accounting demands of a $1.5 million Phase II development contract with multiple technical objectives, prototype fabrication, and commercial partnership activities. The accounting challenge isn’t just tracking more dollars—it’s distinguishing between allowable research costs, unallowable production costs, and commercial development expenses while proving every dollar charged to your SBIR/STTR contract complies with FAR 31.205-18 independent research and development cost principles. Here’s what Phase II contractors need to understand about research versus production cost accounting—and how to build systems supporting both innovation and compliance.

The Regulatory Framework Governing SBIR/STTR Cost Accounting

SBIR and STTR contracts operate under standard Federal Acquisition Regulation cost principles, but with specific considerations reflecting their research and development nature. FAR 35.017 establishes special procedures for SBIR/STTR contracts including simplified acquisition procedures and streamlined administration—but these simplified procedures don’t eliminate fundamental cost accounting obligations under FAR 31.201-2 requiring reasonable costs and FAR 31.201-4 requiring allocable costs supported by adequate records.

The critical regulation Phase II contractors must understand is FAR 31.205-18, governing independent research and development and bid and proposal costs. While SBIR/STTR work is contract-funded research rather than IR&D, this regulation establishes the framework for distinguishing research activities from production, manufacturing, and commercial development. The regulation specifically addresses cost allowability when research transitions toward production, creating the boundary contractors must navigate as Phase II work progresses from prototype development toward commercial products.

13 CFR 121.702 establishes size and eligibility standards for SBIR/STTR programs including the requirement that awardees perform a minimum percentage of work with their own employees rather than subcontractors. This creates cost accounting implications requiring contractors to track work performance by organizational entity, distinguish between prime contractor effort and subcontractor work, and maintain systems proving compliance with percentage-of-work requirements throughout contract performance.

What Phase II Contractors Must Navigate

Here’s what contractors miss about Phase II cost accounting: the contract scope intentionally blurs boundaries between pure research and early production activities as you develop prototypes, test manufacturing processes, and validate commercial viability. Your cost accounting system must maintain clear boundaries even when the technical work flows seamlessly from design to prototype fabrication to manufacturing process development. When your engineer spends morning hours finalizing product design (research cost) and afternoon hours setting up production tooling (unallowable production cost), your timekeeping system must capture that distinction with precision.

The transition from research to production creates the most complex cost accounting challenge in Phase II contracts. You’re funded to develop technology readiness and prove commercial feasibility—work that necessarily involves building prototypes and demonstrating manufacturing capability. But FAR 31.205-1 specifically prohibits charging production costs to government contracts. The boundary lies in intent and scope: building prototypes to prove your technical approach is allowable research; building production inventory for commercial sales is unallowable production cost even when using identical processes and materials.

Material cost accounting gets complicated when you’re purchasing components serving multiple purposes. That batch of specialized semiconductors might support Phase II prototype development (allowable), future production inventory (unallowable), and your separate commercial product line (unallowable to SBIR/STTR). Your purchasing and inventory systems must track material disposition from receipt through consumption, ensuring only materials actually incorporated into Phase II deliverables or consumed in Phase II testing get charged to your government contract.

Understanding DCAA compliance requirements for SBIR/STTR contractors means building systems that maintain research versus production boundaries throughout your technical development process while documenting the business rationale supporting cost classifications when activities serve both research and commercial purposes.

Five Essential Compliance Steps for Phase II Accounting

Step 1: Implement Activity-Based Cost Classification Systems

Build timekeeping systems capturing work activities with sufficient detail to support research versus production cost determinations. Generic labor categories like “engineering” or “fabrication” don’t provide adequate information for cost classification—you need activity codes distinguishing prototype development from production setup, research testing from manufacturing validation, and technical documentation from commercial marketing materials.

Deploy timekeeping systems designed for government contractor requirements with hierarchical activity codes enabling employees to classify work by both contract deliverable and activity type. For example, an engineer might charge time to “Phase II Prototype Development – Design Activities” versus “Phase II Manufacturing Analysis – Production Process Development.” This granular classification provides the documentation supporting cost allowability determinations when research activities approach production boundaries.

Create clear guidance for employees explaining research versus production distinctions with specific examples relevant to your technology and deliverables. When employees understand the compliance implications of cost classifications, they make better real-time decisions about timesheet coding reducing after-the-fact reclassification requirements.

Step 2: Establish Material Cost Tracking and Disposition Controls

Develop comprehensive material tracking systems capturing purchase purpose, storage location, and consumption disposition for all materials supporting Phase II work. Your inventory system must distinguish between materials purchased for prototype development, materials acquired for testing and validation, and materials intended for future production—even when physically identical items come from the same supplier.

Implement lot tracking or serial number controls for high-value materials enabling precise accounting of which specific items were consumed in Phase II activities versus retained for production inventory or commercial use. When DCAA auditors examine material costs, they’ll trace individual purchases from procurement through consumption, requiring your records to demonstrate materials charged to Phase II were actually used in contract performance.

Create systematic procedures for periodic physical inventory verification confirming materials charged to Phase II contracts aren’t sitting in production inventory or incorporated into commercial products. DCAA compliance explained emphasizes prevention through systematic controls rather than retroactive justification when auditors question cost classifications.

Step 3: Deploy Percentage-of-Work Monitoring and Documentation Systems

Build automated tracking systems monitoring your percentage-of-work compliance throughout contract performance rather than calculating ratios only when preparing completion reports. SBIR/STTR contracts typically require prime contractors to perform minimum percentages of work (often 40% for SBIR, 30% for STTR) with additional requirements for small business partners in STTR awards. Your cost accounting system must track work performance by organizational entity providing real-time visibility into percentage-of-work metrics.

Create monthly management reports showing cumulative labor hours and direct costs by performing organization with trending analysis projecting whether current work distribution will satisfy percentage requirements at contract completion. Early identification of percentage-of-work risks enables corrective action through work reallocation or subcontract scope modifications before non-compliance becomes irreversible.

Maintain detailed documentation supporting percentage-of-work calculations including labor distribution analysis, cost allocation methodologies, and work performance verification. When agencies verify percentage-of-work compliance, they expect detailed substantiation demonstrating calculations accurately reflect actual work performance rather than convenient cost allocations achieving required percentages.

Step 4: Create Commercial Activity Cost Segregation Procedures

Implement systematic procedures segregating commercial development costs from Phase II contract costs when your company pursues commercial applications concurrent with government-funded research. Your cost accounting system must maintain clear boundaries between contract-funded activities and company-funded commercialization efforts even when both activities involve the same personnel, facilities, and technology.

Establish approval workflows requiring management review when employees charge time to Phase II contracts while simultaneously working on commercial product development, marketing, or business development activities. Create documentation requirements explaining the specific Phase II deliverables being advanced and how work differs from commercial activities using similar technology.

Build facility and equipment usage tracking systems when shared resources support both Phase II research and commercial production. Usage-based allocation methodologies demonstrate compliance with cost accounting standards while ensuring Phase II contracts bear only their proportionate share of shared costs.

Step 5: Establish Transition Planning and Cost Reclassification Procedures

Develop systematic procedures for identifying when Phase II activities transition from allowable research to unallowable production requiring cost reclassification or contract scope modification. Create quarterly technical and financial reviews examining work activities against research versus production criteria, identifying activities approaching cost allowability boundaries before significant costs accumulate.

Implement proactive communication procedures notifying program managers when technical progress creates potential cost classification changes. Early discussion enables contract modifications expanding scope to cover activities initially appearing to be production but falling within agency’s commercialization support objectives. Many agencies provide Phase III or follow-on production contracts specifically addressing the transition from research to production—proactive planning positions you for these opportunities rather than discovering compliance issues during audits.

The Investment in Phase II Accounting Compliance

Building robust SBIR/STTR Phase II accounting systems costs between $35,000 and $95,000 for small contractors depending on existing system capabilities, technical complexity, and commercial activity integration requirements. This includes implementing activity-based cost tracking, material disposition controls, percentage-of-work monitoring, and commercial cost segregation procedures. Annual maintenance typically runs $12,000 to $25,000 for ongoing system refinement and compliance monitoring.

Let me show you the value: contractors with excellent Phase II accounting systems win Phase III production contracts because agency program managers trust their cost reporting accuracy and cost control capabilities. They secure follow-on SBIR/STTR awards because successful Phase II performance demonstrated through reliable cost management makes them preferred proposers. They commercialize technologies effectively because the discipline of segregating research from production costs during Phase II creates operational capabilities supporting efficient commercial manufacturing.

Contractors without adequate systems face cost disallowance during post-award audits requiring contract negotiations reducing final payments, percentage-of-work violations forcing last-minute subcontract modifications disrupting technical performance, and commercial activity contamination questions delaying contract closeout for months while you reconstruct cost segregation justifications. These compliance issues don’t just affect the current contract—they damage your reputation with program managers affecting future award opportunities.

Understanding SBIR/STTR Program Jurisdiction

SBIR and STTR programs operate across eleven federal agencies including DOD, NASA, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, and Department of Health and Human Services. Each agency administers its program independently with agency-specific procedures, but all agencies use identical cost principles under FAR Part 31 creating uniform cost accounting requirements. Your cost accounting system must satisfy DOD’s requirements whether you’re performing contracts for Army, Air Force Research Laboratory, or Missile Defense Agency—and those same systems work for NASA, DOE, or NSF SBIR/STTR contracts.

Multi-agency SBIR/STTR contractors benefit from standardized cost accounting approaches applicable across your portfolio rather than customizing systems for each agency’s perceived preferences. The fundamental requirement—proving costs charged to contracts are reasonable, allocable, and allowable—remains constant regardless of which agency funds your research.

Your Path to SBIR/STTR Success

The SBIR/STTR Phase II landscape rewards contractors who build robust cost accounting systems early in their government contracting journey. Small companies winning first Phase II awards face steep learning curves understanding government cost accounting requirements while managing ambitious technical programs. The contractors who succeed invest in proper systems before problems emerge rather than treating accounting as an administrative afterthought behind technical performance.

Your Phase II contract represents more than research funding—it’s validation of your technology’s potential and your company’s capability to deliver on government programs. Protecting that validation requires demonstrating cost management competence through systematic accounting supporting every dollar claimed.

For SBIR/STTR contractors managing Phase II accounting requirements while advancing technology development, Hour Timesheet provides solutions specifically designed for research-focused small businesses. Our platform delivers the activity-based timekeeping, cost segregation capabilities, and compliance monitoring tools Phase II contractors need while remaining affordable for small company budgets.

Your innovation deserves professional cost accounting systems supporting both technical success and regulatory compliance.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

← Older Posts