Loading...

SF 1408 Requirements for Government Contracts

SF 1408 Requirements

Your company just won a competitive $2.8 million cost-reimbursement contract—your first significant government award after years pursuing federal opportunities. Then DCAA notified you of an upcoming pre-award accounting system survey using Standard Form 1408. Three weeks later, DCAA issued a determination that your accounting system contains significant deficiencies preventing reliable cost accumulation and allocation, recommending contract award be withheld pending system corrections. Here’s what contractors miss about pre-award surveys: winning the technical and price competition doesn’t guarantee contract award—you must demonstrate accounting system adequacy meeting specific regulatory standards before the government will execute cost-reimbursement contracts, and discovering system deficiencies after contract award notification leaves you scrambling to implement corrections under intense time pressure while the customer questions your operational readiness. Understanding how to prepare for, navigate, and successfully complete pre-award accounting system surveys isn’t about gaming DCAA—it’s about building fundamental business systems supporting reliable cost management, demonstrating organizational maturity handling government funds responsibly, and proving you possess the infrastructure required for successful contract performance before taking on reimbursement-based work.

The Legal Framework Governing Pre-Award Accounting System Requirements

Federal acquisition regulations establish specific accounting system standards contractors must meet before receiving cost-reimbursement contracts. FAR 16.301-3(a)(1) requires contracting officers to ensure adequate accounting systems exist before awarding cost-reimbursement contracts, with adequacy determined through DCAA pre-award surveys evaluating whether contractors maintain systems capable of segregating direct costs from indirect costs, establishing labor distribution based on actual activities, accumulating costs by contract, and supporting invoicing requirements. This isn’t bureaucratic formality—it’s the government ensuring you can actually track costs before agreeing to reimburse them.

The accounting system criteria under DFARS 252.242-7006 establish eighteen specific requirements contractor accounting systems must satisfy including: logical and consistent cost accumulation, proper segregation of direct and indirect costs, identification of costs by contract line item, exclusion of unallowable costs, accurate interim billing, and reliable cost allocation methodologies. Defense contracts subject DFARS requirements, while civilian agency contracts apply similar standards through FAR provisions, but fundamental accounting system expectations remain consistent—you need systems proving you can track costs accurately and charge customers appropriately.

FAR 42.302(a)(12) assigns DCAA responsibility for evaluating contractor accounting systems, conducting surveys using Standard Form 1408 (Pre-Award Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System) to assess system adequacy. DCAA auditors evaluate whether your accounting system design, policies, procedures, and actual practices satisfy regulatory requirements, examining everything from chart of accounts structure to timekeeping procedures to indirect rate calculations. Understanding DCAA compliance requirements means recognizing that pre-award surveys represent comprehensive accounting system assessments rather than limited financial reviews—auditors evaluate end-to-end processes from time recording through invoicing.

The consequence framework involves contract award delays or denials when DCAA identifies significant deficiencies—problems so serious they prevent reliable cost accumulation and billing. Contracting officers cannot award cost-reimbursement contracts when DCAA determines accounting systems contain significant deficiencies, forcing contractors to implement corrections before contract execution. Minor deficiencies that don’t prevent reliable cost management may permit contract award with corrective action plans, but significant deficiencies stop awards completely until remediation is verified through follow-up surveys.

What Contractors Must Understand About Pre-Award Survey Challenges

Here’s what contractors miss about pre-award surveys: DCAA doesn’t evaluate your accounting system against your industry practices or commercial customer expectations—auditors assess compliance with specific federal cost accounting standards that often exceed commercial requirements in documentation rigor, segregation discipline, and allocation sophistication. Your $2.8 million contract opportunity requires accounting infrastructure that many successful commercial businesses don’t maintain, with survey failure rates exceeding 40% for first-time contractors underestimating federal system requirements.

The timekeeping inadequacy represents the most common survey failure when contractors lack daily time recording, contemporaneous supervisor approval, or adequate project coding structures. DCAA compliance explained emphasizes that weekly or bi-weekly timesheets violate federal requirements mandating daily recording. When your employees complete timesheets every Friday covering the previous week, or submit monthly time summaries, or use generic project codes like “overhead” without contract-specific charging, you’ve failed fundamental timekeeping requirements guaranteed to produce significant deficiency findings. DCAA expects systems where employees record hours daily, charge time to specific contracts using detailed job codes, and receive supervisor review and approval demonstrating management oversight of labor distribution accuracy.

The cost segregation challenge emerges when contractors lack adequate accounting structure distinguishing direct costs chargeable to specific contracts from indirect costs benefiting multiple contracts requiring allocation. This is where audits go sideways—contractors operating with simplified chart of accounts adequate for commercial work discover federal requirements demand separate general ledger accounts for direct labor, indirect labor, fringe benefits, overhead expenses, general and administrative costs, and unallowable costs with clear segregation preventing cost misclassification. When your accounting system lumps various cost types together requiring manual analysis to separate direct from indirect costs, you’ve created the lack of adequate cost segregation that DCAA flags as a significant deficiency.

The indirect rate methodology problem surfaces when contractors either lack formal indirect rate structures or maintain rate calculations that fail basic adequacy tests. Small businesses transitioning from commercial work often have no indirect rate infrastructure, simply marking up direct costs by arbitrary percentages without documented cost pool composition or allocation base logic. Others maintain rate calculations mixing unallowable costs in indirect pools, using inconsistent allocation bases across cost types, or lacking adequate documentation supporting rate computations. Understanding DCAA timekeeping requirements includes recognizing that indirect rates require systematic cost accumulation, rational allocation bases, and comprehensive documentation proving rate calculations produce equitable cost distribution rather than arbitrary markups.

The unallowable cost failure occurs when contractors lack procedures identifying and excluding costs that FAR prohibits charging to government contracts. Without systematic unallowable cost identification, accounting systems accumulate entertainment, lobbying, advertising, and other restricted costs in indirect pools, then allocate portions to government contracts through indirect rates. DCAA views this as fundamental system inadequacy—you must maintain accounting procedures identifying unallowable costs at initial recording, segregating them in separate accounts, and excluding them from indirect rate calculations ensuring government contracts never absorb prohibited expenses through overhead allocation.

The billing support inadequacy manifests when contractors cannot demonstrate how costs accumulate from source documents through general ledger to contract invoices. DCAA auditors trace costs backward from invoices through job costing to original timesheets, purchase orders, and receipts, evaluating whether your system provides clear audit trail supporting billed amounts. When this traceability breaks down—when you can’t easily demonstrate which specific timesheets supported last month’s labor billing or which general ledger transactions compose invoice amounts—you’ve revealed system inadequacy that DCAA flags as preventing reliable billing verification.

The documentation gap becomes apparent when contractors lack written accounting policies, procedures, timekeeping instructions, indirect rate methodologies, or system descriptions. DCAA expects comprehensive documentation explaining how your accounting system operates, what procedures employees follow, how costs flow through accounts, and what controls ensure accuracy. Undocumented systems relying on institutional knowledge or informal practices fail federal requirements demanding systematic, documented processes supporting compliance continuity despite personnel changes.

Five Essential Steps for Pre-Award Survey Success

Step 1: Implement Compliant Daily Timekeeping Before DCAA Survey

Establish daily timesheet systems requiring employees to record hours each day against specific charge codes identifying contracts, indirect activities, and cost types. Configure timekeeping to prevent weekly or bi-weekly summary recording, require daily entries, and generate exception reports identifying late or missing timesheets demanding immediate correction. Deploy Hour Timesheet or similar DCAA-compliant platforms providing required daily functionality, audit trail documentation, and supervisor approval workflows meeting federal standards.

Develop comprehensive charge code structures enabling detailed labor distribution including specific contract identifiers, contract line items when applicable, indirect cost pools (fringe, overhead, G&A), IR&D projects, and unallowable activities. Train employees on proper charge code selection, require project managers to validate time distribution accuracy, and implement controls preventing generic or default coding that fails DCAA adequacy standards. The charge code structure provides foundation for cost accumulation and allocation—inadequate coding granularity guarantees survey failure.

Implement supervisor review and approval procedures requiring timely timesheet approval, documented supervisor sign-off, and management certification that recorded time distribution represents actual work performed. Configure systems preventing payroll processing of unapproved timesheets, escalating approval delays, and maintaining permanent approval documentation supporting audit verification. This approval discipline demonstrates management oversight that DCAA considers essential to reliable labor cost accumulation.

Step 2: Configure Accounting Systems with Adequate Cost Segregation Structure

Redesign chart of accounts providing separate general ledger accounts for major cost categories including direct labor by contract, indirect labor by pool type, fringe benefits, materials and subcontracts by contract, overhead expenses by type, G&A expenses, and unallowable costs. Establish account structure enabling clear cost segregation without requiring manual analysis to separate cost types, ensuring your general ledger directly supports indirect rate calculations and contract cost accumulation.

Implement job costing functionality accumulating direct costs by specific contract, enabling you to answer fundamental questions like “what did Contract ABC cost us last month?” without spreadsheet analysis. Configure systems to automatically post labor costs to contracts based on approved timesheet distribution, charge material and subcontract costs to contracts based on purchase order references, and accumulate other direct costs through proper account coding. This automated job costing provides the contract-specific cost accumulation that DCAA considers non-negotiable for cost-reimbursement contract management.

Establish indirect cost pools with clear definitions including which expenses belong in each pool, how costs flow into pools through account structure, and what allocation bases distribute pool costs to final cost objectives. Document your indirect rate structure explaining pool composition, allocation methodology, and calculation procedures. This rate infrastructure transforms your accounting system from commercial simplicity to federal compliance supporting the systematic cost allocation that government reimbursement requires.

Step 3: Develop Comprehensive Written Accounting Policies and Procedures

Create detailed accounting system description documenting your chart of accounts, cost accumulation methodology, labor distribution procedures, indirect rate calculations, billing processes, and control procedures. This system description provides DCAA auditors comprehensive overview of your accounting infrastructure while demonstrating systematic approach to cost management rather than ad hoc practices.

Develop written timekeeping policies establishing daily recording requirements, charge code selection guidance, approval procedures, correction protocols, and compliance standards. Distribute policies to all employees, conduct training ensuring understanding, and implement acknowledgment procedures documenting that employees received and understood timekeeping requirements. Written policies create the compliance foundation that informal practices cannot provide during DCAA evaluation.

Prepare indirect rate methodology documentation explaining pool definitions, expense classifications, allocation base selections, calculation procedures, and rate application methods. Include supporting rationale explaining why selected methodologies produce equitable cost distribution, reference applicable cost accounting standards, and document management approval of rate calculation approaches. This methodology documentation demonstrates that indirect rates result from deliberate accounting design rather than arbitrary markup percentages.

Step 4: Implement Unallowable Cost Identification and Exclusion Procedures

Establish systematic procedures identifying unallowable costs at initial recording including entertainment expenses, alcoholic beverages, lobbying costs, certain advertising, executive compensation exceeding caps, and other FAR-prohibited costs. Train accounts payable staff to flag potentially unallowable expenses during invoice processing, require management review of flagged items, and code confirmed unallowable costs to dedicated general ledger accounts excluded from indirect pools.

Develop unallowable cost monitoring including monthly reviews identifying expenses potentially violating allowability restrictions, quarterly indirect rate recalculations excluding unallowable amounts, and annual comprehensive reviews supporting year-end rate determinations. Create documentation supporting unallowable cost determinations including FAR citations, management analysis, and exclusion calculations proving government contracts never absorb prohibited costs through rate allocation.

Implement billing controls ensuring direct costs charged to contracts meet allowability standards including purchase authorization procedures requiring contract charging approval before procurement, invoice review validating costs comply with contract scope and FAR requirements, and management certification that billed costs are reasonable, allocable, and allowable. These billing controls prevent direct charging of unallowable costs that indirect cost procedures wouldn’t catch.

Step 5: Conduct Pre-Survey Readiness Assessment and Remediation

Perform internal accounting system assessment before contract award notification using SF 1408 criteria evaluating timekeeping adequacy, cost segregation, indirect rates, unallowable cost procedures, billing support, and documentation completeness. Identify deficiencies requiring correction, develop remediation plans with specific timelines, and implement fixes before DCAA survey rather than scrambling after survey announcement.

Engage qualified consultants to conduct mock DCAA surveys examining your accounting system against federal standards, identifying compliance gaps, and providing remediation guidance. External assessment provides objective evaluation while enabling correction before actual DCAA review, dramatically improving survey success probability. The mock survey investment costs far less than losing contract awards or implementing emergency fixes under DCAA pressure.

Document all accounting system improvements including implementation dates, responsible personnel, and verification procedures proving corrections were implemented effectively. Maintain implementation records supporting demonstration to DCAA that identified deficiencies were corrected, controls were established preventing recurrence, and your system now meets federal adequacy standards enabling successful survey completion.

The Investment in Pre-Award Survey Preparation

Implementing compliant accounting systems meeting DCAA pre-award survey standards costs between $25,000 and $85,000 for small to mid-sized contractors depending on system complexity, current infrastructure adequacy, and remediation scope. This includes timekeeping system implementation, chart of accounts redesign, policy documentation, indirect rate development, and consultant support. Annual maintenance costs typically run $8,000 to $20,000 for ongoing compliance monitoring, system updates, and documentation maintenance.

Let me show you the value: contractors with compliant accounting systems pass pre-award surveys enabling contract awards, avoid the contract delays that damage customer relationships and business reputation, and build infrastructure supporting efficient operations and financial management beyond bare compliance. They compete effectively for cost-reimbursement opportunities that many competitors cannot pursue due to accounting system inadequacy, creating competitive advantages in lucrative contract segments.

Contractors with inadequate accounting systems face contract award denials losing business opportunities after investing heavily in capture and proposal efforts, experience prolonged contract execution delays while implementing emergency system corrections, and suffer reputation damage when customers question operational readiness based on accounting system failures. They incur crisis consulting costs implementing rushed fixes exceeding the investment proper preparation would require, while still risking inadequate remediation prolonging survey resolution.

Understanding Pre-Award Survey Scope Across Contract Types and Agencies

Pre-award accounting system surveys apply primarily to cost-reimbursement contracts where the government reimburses actual costs requiring reliable cost tracking, though certain cost-type fixed-price contracts like time-and-materials may trigger surveys when cost visibility and audit trail become contractually important. Fixed-price contracts generally don’t require pre-award surveys since the government pays agreed prices regardless of your actual costs, though exceptional circumstances involving cost-based pricing or high contract values might trigger reviews.

Department of Defense contracts operate under DFARS accounting system requirements establishing specific criteria and compliance standards, while civilian agency contracts follow FAR provisions with generally similar expectations but potentially different emphasis areas. Your accounting system must satisfy applicable standards for your target customer agencies, with DoD requirements typically representing the most stringent baseline that satisfies most civilian agency needs.

Your Path to Pre-Award Survey Success

The pre-award survey landscape rewards contractors who invest in compliant accounting infrastructure before pursuing cost-reimbursement contracts rather than winning awards then discovering system inadequacy. DCAA evaluates accounting systems against clear regulatory standards consistently applied across contractors, with survey success depending on systematic compliance rather than auditor relationships or negotiation.

For contractors seeking pre-award survey preparation, Hour Timesheet provides purpose-built daily timekeeping platforms meeting DCAA requirements out-of-the-box, enabling rapid compliant implementation without custom development. Our systems provide the timekeeping foundation supporting survey success while integrating with accounting platforms enabling comprehensive cost management.

Your contract opportunities deserve accounting infrastructure enabling award rather than creating barriers. Build compliant systems before you need them, ensuring readiness when opportunities emerge.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

DCAA Compliance Without the Enterprise Price Tag: Affordable Timekeeping for Government Contractors

Government contractors face a unique challenge: meeting stringent Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) requirements without breaking the bank on enterprise-level software. If you’ve researched DCAA-compliant timesheet systems, you’ve likely encountered solutions with hefty price tags, complex implementations, and features you’ll never use. The good news? DCAA compliance doesn’t require an enterprise budget.

The Enterprise Software Trap

Many government contractors assume that DCAA compliance means investing in expensive enterprise resource planning systems or specialized government contractor software that costs thousands of dollars per month. These platforms often come with lengthy implementation timelines, extensive training requirements, and support costs that quickly add up. For small to mid-sized contractors working on their first government contracts or those with lean operational teams, these solutions create an impossible choice: risk audit failures or drain resources that should support growth.

The misconception that only expensive software can meet DCAA standards has created unnecessary barriers for contractors who could otherwise compete successfully for government work. In reality, DCAA compliance isn’t about how much you spend on software. It’s about meeting specific timekeeping requirements consistently and accurately.

What DCAA Really Requires

Understanding DCAA compliance starts with recognizing what auditors actually look for during reviews. The DCAA’s primary concern is ensuring that labor costs charged to government contracts are accurate, verifiable, and properly allocated. This means your timekeeping system must support daily time entry, provide a clear audit trail, prevent retroactive changes without supervisor approval, and accurately distribute labor costs across contracts and indirect accounts.

The key requirements include contemporaneous time entry where employees record time daily or as work is performed, not days or weeks later. Your system needs proper internal controls including supervisor review and approval of timesheets before payroll processing. You must maintain detailed records showing exactly how time is charged to specific contracts, tasks, and indirect cost pools. The system should generate reports that match SF1408 format requirements, making it easy to demonstrate compliance during audits. Perhaps most critically, you need a complete audit trail documenting any timesheet corrections, who made them, when, and why.

None of these requirements inherently demand expensive enterprise software. They demand thoughtful system design and proper implementation.

The Cost of Non-Compliance

Before exploring affordable solutions, it’s worth understanding what’s at stake. DCAA audit findings related to timekeeping deficiencies can have serious consequences. Contractors may face questioned costs where the government refuses to reimburse labor expenses that can’t be properly documented. In more serious cases, the DCAA may determine your entire accounting system is inadequate, putting future contract awards at risk.

The financial impact extends beyond disallowed costs. Audit findings trigger additional scrutiny on current and future contracts. Your proposal rates may be rejected. Contracting officers may withhold payments pending corrective action. In extreme cases, persistent non-compliance can lead to contract termination or suspension from government contracting altogether.

These consequences affect contractors of all sizes, but they’re particularly devastating for smaller firms without the resources to absorb disallowed costs or survive extended payment delays. The irony is that many contractors face these problems not because they tried to cut corners, but because they relied on timekeeping systems that couldn’t support DCAA requirements, or because enterprise solutions proved too complex for their teams to use consistently.

Rethinking the DCAA Software Investment

Affordable DCAA compliance starts with focusing on requirements rather than brand names. Enterprise software often includes extensive features for manufacturing, inventory management, complex project planning, and multi-national operations. Government contractors working primarily on service contracts don’t need most of these capabilities. What you need is rock-solid timekeeping that meets DCAA standards.

Purpose-built DCAA-compliant timesheet software addresses this gap. These solutions focus specifically on government contractor timekeeping requirements without the overhead of unnecessary enterprise features. They provide daily time entry interfaces that employees actually use, supervisor approval workflows that create proper audit trails, labor distribution capabilities that accurately allocate costs across contracts and indirect pools, and reporting that matches DCAA expectations and SF1408 format requirements.

The implementation difference is equally significant. Enterprise systems often require months of setup, extensive customization, and ongoing administrator oversight. Purpose-built solutions can typically be configured and deployed in days or weeks, with intuitive interfaces that require minimal training. This faster implementation means you’re compliant sooner, and simpler administration means you’re not paying for dedicated system administrators or expensive consultants.

What Affordable DCAA Compliance Looks Like

Modern cloud-based DCAA-compliant timesheet solutions deliver everything auditors require at a fraction of enterprise software costs. Employees can enter time daily through web browsers or mobile apps, recording hours against specific contracts, projects, and labor categories. The system enforces daily time entry and prevents backdating without proper authorization.

Supervisors review and approve timesheets electronically, creating clear audit trails showing who approved what and when. The system prevents processing of unapproved timesheets, ensuring internal controls remain intact. When corrections are necessary, the system documents the original entry, the correction, who made it, and the reason, satisfying DCAA requirements for timesheet modification controls.

Labor distribution happens automatically as employees enter time, allocating costs appropriately across direct contract work, fringe benefits, overhead, and other indirect cost pools. The system generates reports showing labor distribution by employee, project, contract, and time period, making it straightforward to support indirect rate calculations and respond to auditor questions.

Integration with accounting and payroll systems ensures consistency between timesheets, payroll, and job costing. This integration eliminates manual data entry errors and provides the reconciliation that auditors expect between different financial systems.

All of this functionality is available in solutions priced for small to mid-sized contractors, often at a fraction of what enterprise systems cost.

Implementation Without the Enterprise Headaches

Affordability extends beyond subscription costs to implementation effort. Purpose-built DCAA-compliant timesheet solutions typically offer straightforward setup processes. You configure your organizational structure, define your contracts and labor categories, set up approval workflows, and import your employee list. Most contractors can complete basic setup in a few hours and be running their first pay period within days.

Compare this to enterprise implementations that require business process reengineering, extensive data migration, custom report development, and weeks of training. The smaller scope and focused purpose of DCAA timesheet software means faster time to value and lower total cost of ownership.

Training is similarly streamlined. Employees need to learn how to enter time, request time off, and submit timesheets for approval. Supervisors learn how to review, approve, and request corrections when necessary. Administrators configure contracts, manage users, and run reports. These are focused, learnable tasks, not complex enterprise workflows requiring extensive documentation and ongoing support.

Maintaining Compliance Long-Term

The best DCAA-compliant timesheet solution is one your team will actually use consistently. Enterprise systems often fail not because they lack features, but because they’re too complex for daily use. Employees take shortcuts. Supervisors batch-approve without reviewing. Administrators struggle to generate required reports. These patterns create compliance gaps despite expensive software investments.

Affordable, purpose-built solutions succeed because they’re designed for the actual users: contractors’ employees who need to record time quickly, supervisors who need to review timesheets efficiently, and administrators who need clear reporting without becoming system experts. When software supports rather than impedes daily work, compliance becomes sustainable.

Regular DCAA compliance also requires staying current with changing requirements. Reputable timesheet software providers monitor DCAA guidance, update their systems to reflect current standards, and communicate changes to customers. This ongoing compliance support is typically included in subscription pricing, whereas enterprise systems may charge separately for updates or require custom modifications to address new requirements.

Making the Decision

Choosing DCAA-compliant timesheet software comes down to understanding your actual requirements and finding a solution that meets them without unnecessary complexity or cost. Start by documenting your specific needs: number of users, number of contracts, integration requirements with your accounting system, and any special reporting needs.

Evaluate solutions based on their DCAA compliance features rather than general enterprise capabilities. Can employees enter time daily? Does it enforce approval workflows? Does it create proper audit trails? Can it handle your labor distribution requirements? Does it generate DCAA-format reports? These are the questions that matter.

Consider the total cost of ownership including subscription fees, implementation costs, training time, and ongoing administration. A solution that costs more per month but implements in days with minimal training may be more affordable than a cheaper solution requiring months of implementation and extensive support.

Most importantly, involve your team in the evaluation. The finance director who’ll run reports, the project managers who’ll review timesheets, and employees who’ll enter time daily all have perspectives that matter. Software that looks good in a demo but frustrates daily users won’t deliver compliance no matter how many features it includes.

The Competitive Advantage

DCAA compliance on a reasonable budget does more than satisfy auditors. It creates a competitive advantage. Government contractors who can demonstrate robust timekeeping and accounting systems win more contracts and maintain better relationships with contracting officers. Reliable compliance means fewer audit issues, faster payment processing, and stronger proposal credibility.

For contractors just entering the government market, affordable DCAA compliance lowers barriers to entry. You can compete for contracts without first making massive software investments, allowing you to grow your government business portfolio profitably. For established contractors, right-sized DCAA solutions free up resources for business development, talent acquisition, and operational improvements rather than software overhead.

Moving Forward

DCAA compliance without enterprise pricing isn’t a compromise. It’s a strategic choice to invest in software that meets your actual requirements efficiently. Purpose-built DCAA-compliant timesheet solutions deliver everything auditors require while supporting your team’s daily work and your company’s growth.

The defense and government services market offers tremendous opportunities for contractors of all sizes. Don’t let misconceptions about DCAA software requirements hold your business back. Compliance is achievable, affordable, and sustainable with the right approach and the right tools.

If you’re currently using spreadsheets, manual processes, or generic time tracking software that doesn’t support DCAA requirements, it’s time to evaluate purpose-built solutions. If you’re paying enterprise prices for capabilities you don’t need, there are more cost-effective options. DCAA compliance should enable your government contracting success, not consume the profits from it.

System Integration Challenges: When Multiple Platforms Create Compliance Gaps

DCAA integration requirements

Your company runs best-in-class systems across operations—ADP for payroll, Deltek for project accounting, Concur for expense management, and a specialized timekeeping platform for DCAA compliance. Each system excels individually, but during your incurred cost audit, DCAA auditors discovered labor costs in Deltek didn’t match timesheet totals, expense allocations in Concur used different project codes than your accounting system, and payroll hours in ADP reflected different calculations than approved timesheets. Here’s what contractors miss about multi-platform environments: each system working perfectly in isolation can still create systematic compliance failures when integration gaps produce data inconsistencies violating FAR 31.201-4 requirements for adequate cost accounting records. Understanding how to design, implement, and monitor system integration protecting data integrity across platforms isn’t about limiting technology choices—it’s about ensuring your technology ecosystem supports rather than undermines the compliance obligations protecting your contract portfolio.

The Legal Framework Integration Must Satisfy

Federal cost accounting requirements create specific integration obligations ensuring data consistency across systems supporting government contract costs. FAR 31.201-2 mandates that allowable costs flow from adequate accounting systems, meaning your integrated platform architecture must maintain data accuracy, allocation consistency, and audit trail integrity as information flows between timekeeping, payroll, project accounting, and financial reporting systems. Integration isn’t just IT infrastructure—it’s a compliance requirement proving cost accumulation accuracy.

Cost Accounting Standard 401 governs consistency in estimating, accumulating, and reporting costs, requiring contractors to maintain consistent practices across all cost accounting activities. When your timekeeping system uses one set of project codes, your project accounting uses different codes, and your financial reporting consolidates using yet another classification structure, you violate CAS 401 consistency requirements regardless of whether individual systems maintain internal consistency. Integration architecture must enforce consistent cost classification and allocation methodologies across all platforms.

The critical consideration involves FAR 52.215-2, requiring contractors to maintain records supporting costs charged to government contracts with adequate documentation enabling verification. When DCAA auditors trace costs from invoices through job costing to original source documents, your integrated systems must provide clear transaction trails across platforms without gaps, manual reconciliations, or unexplained variances suggesting data integrity problems. Integration failures creating traceability gaps trigger systematic questioning of cost accuracy and accounting system adequacy.

What Contractors Must Understand About Integration Complexity

Here’s what contractors miss about integrated systems: purchasing excellent platforms from reputable vendors doesn’t automatically create compliant integration—you need deliberate architecture design, systematic data validation, and continuous monitoring ensuring information flows accurately between systems while maintaining audit trail integrity. Your $500,000 ERP and $50,000 timekeeping platform can still generate compliance failures through poor integration creating data inconsistencies DCAA discovers during audits.

The data mapping challenge creates immediate integration problems when different platforms use incompatible classification structures. Understanding DCAA compliance requirements means ensuring your timekeeping system’s contract codes map perfectly to project accounting’s job numbers, which align with general ledger accounts, which correspond to contract line items in your billing system. When marketing calls it “Project Phoenix,” engineering codes it as “CONT-2024-089,” accounting records it under “Job 4532,” and billing references “CLIN 0001” under contract “FA8650-24-C-6789,” you’ve created integration complexity requiring cross-reference tables that become outdated and generate misallocations.

Real-time versus batch integration affects compliance when systems exchange data on different schedules creating temporary inconsistencies. Your timekeeping platform might feed approved hours to project accounting weekly while payroll processes bi-weekly and general ledger updates monthly. During DCAA audits examining specific dates, these timing differences create apparent discrepancies requiring extensive reconciliation explaining why systems showed different values on audit snapshot dates. Real-time integration eliminating timing lags provides cleaner audit trails though requiring more sophisticated technical architecture.

Manual intervention points represent the highest-risk integration elements where people bridge system gaps through spreadsheet downloads, data re-keying, or allocation adjustments. DCAA compliance explained emphasizes automated integration preventing human error and manipulation. Every manual step creates compliance risk—the person might make keying errors, apply incorrect allocation percentages, or introduce changes without proper authorization and documentation. Automated integration with systematic validation controls eliminates these human error points while providing better audit trails.

The reconciliation burden increases exponentially with platform count—integrating three systems requires three reconciliation procedures, while five systems demand ten different reconciliations ensuring data consistency across all platform pairs. This reconciliation workload often overwhelms accounting staff, resulting in cursory monthly reviews that miss systematic integration failures accumulating into material compliance problems discovered during annual audits.

Five Essential Steps for Compliant System Integration

Step 1: Design Comprehensive Integration Architecture with Data Flow Mapping

Create detailed documentation mapping how data flows between all platforms supporting government contract costs including timekeeping, payroll, expense management, project accounting, procurement, general ledger, and billing systems. Develop visual data flow diagrams showing information movement, transformation points, and validation controls at each interface. Document the business rules governing data mapping, transformation logic, and error handling procedures ensuring consistent application.

Establish master data management procedures ensuring consistent reference data across all integrated platforms including employee listings, contract codes, cost center structures, and account classifications. Deploy centralized master data repositories feeding consistent information to all downstream systems preventing the classification inconsistencies that create compliance failures. When you add a new contract, update master data once with automatic distribution to all integrated systems maintaining perfect synchronization.

Build integration architecture emphasizing real-time data exchange over batch processing when technically feasible and cost-effective. Real-time integration eliminates timing inconsistencies while providing immediate visibility into data flow problems requiring correction. Where batch integration remains necessary, document processing schedules, cutoff procedures, and reconciliation requirements ensuring timing differences don’t create compliance gaps during audits.

Step 2: Implement Automated Data Validation and Error Detection Controls

Deploy systematic validation procedures at every integration point verifying data accuracy, completeness, and consistency before accepting information from source systems. Build automated controls comparing transmitted data totals to received amounts, validating that timesheet hours flowing to project accounting equal approved timesheet totals, and confirming payroll processing used identical hours as approved timesheets without unexplained variances.

Create exception reporting identifying integration anomalies including missing data, duplicate records, invalid codes, or calculation variances requiring immediate investigation. Configure automated alerts notifying appropriate personnel when integration failures occur, preventing problems from accumulating undetected until discovered during month-end closing or annual audits. Treat integration errors as critical failures demanding immediate resolution rather than acceptable variances to address eventually.

Establish threshold controls flagging significant variances between integrated systems for mandatory management review. When project accounting labor costs differ from timesheet system totals by more than established tolerance (e.g., 1% or $10,000), require documented investigation and approval before proceeding with financial closing. These controls prevent inadvertently accepting material integration failures through cursory reconciliation reviews.

Step 3: Create Comprehensive System Reconciliation Procedures and Schedules

Develop formal reconciliation procedures for every integrated system pair documenting specific data elements to compare, acceptable variance thresholds, investigation procedures for discrepancies, and approval requirements for accepting reconciled results. Create standardized reconciliation templates ensuring consistent execution by different personnel and facilitating management review of reconciliation quality.

Implement monthly reconciliation schedules ensuring systematic verification of integration accuracy rather than relying on annual reviews discovering accumulated problems. Monthly frequency enables identifying integration failures promptly when root causes remain fresh and correction remains feasible without extensive reconstruction. Document all reconciliations with formal reports demonstrating systematic monitoring to DCAA auditors evaluating accounting system adequacy.

Deploy reconciliation automation through tools comparing data extracts from integrated systems, identifying variances automatically, and generating exception reports highlighting items requiring investigation. Automation increases reconciliation thoroughness while reducing staff workload, enabling more frequent verification supporting earlier problem detection and resolution.

Step 4: Establish Integration Testing and Change Management Procedures

Create systematic testing procedures for all system changes potentially affecting integration including software updates, configuration modifications, process improvements, or new platform implementations. Deploy sandbox environments enabling integration testing before production deployment ensuring changes don’t disrupt data flows or introduce validation errors. DCAA timekeeping requirements demand systems maintaining integrity through organizational and technology evolution.

Implement formal change management procedures requiring integration impact analysis before approving system modifications. When your timekeeping vendor releases updates or your project accounting requires configuration changes, evaluate integration implications and update interface specifications, validation controls, and reconciliation procedures accordingly. Document all changes with version control ensuring ability to track when integration modifications occurred and troubleshoot issues emerging after changes.

Conduct quarterly integration health assessments reviewing error logs, reconciliation results, user feedback, and system performance metrics identifying degradation requiring proactive correction before problems escalate into compliance failures. These assessments demonstrate systematic integration management while enabling continuous improvement addressing issues before DCAA discovers problems during audits.

Step 5: Build Integration Documentation and Training Programs

Develop comprehensive documentation describing integration architecture, data flows, validation controls, reconciliation procedures, and troubleshooting guidelines. Create documentation accessible to technical staff maintaining integrations, accounting personnel performing reconciliations, and management overseeing compliance. Include vendor contact information, support procedures, and escalation paths for integration failures requiring immediate assistance.

Establish training programs educating staff about integration dependencies, proper procedures for data entry across integrated platforms, and recognition of integration problems requiring reporting. When employees understand how their actions in one system affect other platforms, they make better decisions preventing integration errors. Training should emphasize that working around integration failures through manual corrections creates compliance risks requiring management awareness and approval.

Create succession planning documentation ensuring integration knowledge doesn’t reside exclusively with single individuals whose departure creates operational and compliance risks. Document technical specifications, business processes, and institutional knowledge supporting continuity when personnel changes occur. DCAA evaluates business system sustainability including whether contractors maintain adequate documentation enabling operations continuity despite staff turnover.

The Investment in Integration Compliance

Implementing comprehensive system integration meeting DCAA requirements costs between $35,000 and $125,000 for small to mid-sized contractors depending on platform count, integration complexity, and automation level. This includes interface development, validation control configuration, reconciliation procedure establishment, testing, documentation, and training. Annual maintenance costs typically run $8,000 to $25,000 for ongoing monitoring, vendor coordination, and integration updates.

Let me show you the value: contractors with excellent integration demonstrate accounting system adequacy to DCAA through systematic data accuracy, enabling efficient audit processes with minimal questioned costs. They generate reliable management reports supporting business decisions because data consistency across platforms provides trustworthy information. They reduce accounting staff workload through automation eliminating manual reconciliation burden while improving accuracy.

Contractors with poor integration face systematic compliance failures requiring extensive audit reconstruction when integration errors create unexplainable variances between systems. They experience questioned costs when integration failures prevent proving cost accuracy to DCAA auditors. They waste accounting staff time on manual reconciliations and error correction rather than value-added financial analysis supporting business growth.

Understanding Integration Requirements Across Federal Agencies

FAR cost accounting requirements and CAS consistency standards apply uniformly across all federal agencies creating identical integration obligations whether supporting Department of Defense, NASA, Department of Energy, or civilian agency contracts. Your integration architecture must satisfy consistent compliance standards regardless of customer agency, eliminating ability to maintain different integration approaches for different contract types.

Cost-reimbursement and fixed-price contracts face identical integration requirements when fixed prices were based on cost data or when contracts require cost tracking supporting performance measurement or contract modifications. Your integrated systems must serve all contract types through comprehensive data accuracy and consistency approaches.

Your Path to Integration Success

The system integration landscape rewards contractors who invest in deliberate architecture design and systematic monitoring rather than assuming best-in-class platforms automatically integrate properly. DCAA evaluates accounting system adequacy including integration integrity, viewing data consistency across platforms as fundamental business system requirement.

For contractors seeking integrated compliance solutions, Hour Timesheet provides purpose-built platforms designed for seamless integration with major accounting, payroll, and project management systems. Our integration architecture emphasizes automated data validation, real-time synchronization, and comprehensive audit trails ensuring DCAA compliance across your technology ecosystem.

Your platform choices should enable rather than complicate compliance. Build integration architecture ensuring your technology investments support systematic cost accounting accuracy.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

 

Government Contract Accounting: The Complete Guide for Federal Contractors

Every year, thousands of small businesses win their first government contract and immediately make the same critical mistake: they assume their existing accounting system will work fine. After all, accounting is accounting, right? They’ve been tracking revenue, expenses, and profits for years. How different could government work be?

The answer: dramatically different. Government contract accounting operates under an entirely separate set of rules designed to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent appropriately. Contractors who don’t understand these rules face suspended payments, contract termination, and in severe cases, allegations of fraud. The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) doesn’t care that you’re a successful commercial business—if your accounting system can’t prove your costs are allowable, allocable, and reasonable, you’re not ready for government work.

This guide explains the core principles of government contract accounting in plain language. Whether you’re pursuing your first federal contract, struggling to understand why the DCAA rejected your accounting system, or trying to formalize the informal practices that worked when you were smaller, you’ll learn what government contract accounting actually requires and how to implement it correctly.

This isn’t just theory. Understanding these principles is the difference between a profitable government contracting business and one that loses money on every contract because indirect costs weren’t tracked properly. It’s the difference between sailing through DCAA audits and spending months remediating findings. Most importantly, it’s the foundation for sustainable growth in the government marketplace.

What Is Government Contract Accounting?

Government contract accounting is a specialized approach to financial management designed to satisfy federal regulations governing how contractors track, allocate, and report costs charged to government contracts. While commercial accounting focuses primarily on profitability and tax compliance, government contract accounting must prove that every dollar billed to the government is allowable under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) rules, properly allocated to the correct contract, and reasonable given market conditions.

The fundamental principle is accountability. When a business charges costs to a government contract, they’re not just recording an expense—they’re making a claim against taxpayer funds. The government requires contractors to maintain accounting systems that can demonstrate, with documentary evidence, exactly how those costs were incurred and why they should be reimbursed or included in contract pricing.

This accountability framework exists because of historical problems with defense contracting. During World War II and the subsequent military buildup, the government discovered contractors were charging wildly inappropriate costs to contracts—personal expenses, lavish entertainment, costs that benefited commercial work but were charged to government projects. In response, Congress established detailed rules about what costs are allowable, how they must be tracked, and what accounting systems must demonstrate.

The regulatory framework for government contract accounting includes several key components:

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) serves as the primary rule book, with Part 31 specifically addressing contract cost principles and procedures. FAR Part 31 defines which costs are allowable, which are unallowable, and how contractors must handle allocations.

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) adds additional requirements for Department of Defense contracts, the largest segment of government contracting.

Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) provide detailed requirements for larger contractors to maintain consistency in how they estimate, accumulate, and report costs. While CAS only applies to contracts exceeding certain thresholds (generally $2 million for modified CAS coverage), the principles inform best practices for all contractors.

DCAA Audit Guidance interprets how these regulations apply in practice. The Defense Contract Audit Agency conducts audits and evaluates whether contractor accounting systems comply with these requirements.

The critical difference between commercial and government contract accounting is this: in commercial work, if you can justify an expense for tax purposes and it improves profitability, you’re probably fine. In government contracting, you must prove the expense is specifically allowable under FAR, properly allocated using a consistent methodology, and charged only to contracts that benefit from that expense. You can’t just “write it off”—you must be able to defend every allocation decision with documentation and logic.

This rigor makes government contract accounting more complex, but it also provides structure. Once you understand the rules and implement proper systems, government contracting becomes predictable. You know exactly what you can charge, how to allocate indirect costs, and what documentation you need. The contractors who struggle are usually those trying to retrofit commercial accounting practices rather than starting with a proper foundation.

The 5 Core Principles of Government Contract Accounting

Understanding government contract accounting starts with five fundamental principles. Every requirement, every DCAA audit question, and every compliance challenge traces back to these core concepts. Master these principles, and the details become much easier to manage.

Principle 1: Proper Cost Classification

Cost classification is the foundation of government contract accounting. Every expense your business incurs must be classified as either a direct cost or an indirect cost, and this distinction determines how you charge that cost to contracts.

Direct costs are expenses that can be specifically identified with a particular contract. When an engineer works exclusively on Contract A for a week, that engineer’s salary for that week is a direct cost to Contract A. When you purchase materials that will only be used on Contract B, those materials are direct costs to Contract B. Direct costs benefit a single contract, can be traced to that contract without ambiguity, and are charged directly to that contract’s cost pool.

Indirect costs are expenses that benefit multiple contracts or your business as a whole. Your rent benefits every project your team works on. Your HR manager’s salary supports all employees regardless of which contracts they work on. Your liability insurance protects the entire business. These indirect costs must be accumulated in pools and allocated to contracts using a rational methodology—you can’t simply guess or charge them arbitrarily.

The distinction matters enormously for contract pricing and billing. On cost-reimbursement contracts, properly classified direct costs can be billed as incurred. Indirect costs are billed using provisional rates that are later reconciled to actual costs. On fixed-price contracts, your bid must accurately reflect both direct and indirect costs or you’ll lose money when costs exceed your price.

Common classification mistakes cause serious audit findings. Contractors often misclassify costs as direct when they should be indirect (or vice versa) based on convenience rather than actual benefit. For example, charging a project manager’s entire salary to a single contract when they actually support multiple projects is misclassification—their time should be allocated as an indirect cost or tracked daily and charged based on actual hours worked per contract.

Another frequent error is inconsistency—treating similar costs differently without justification. If you charge one employee’s training as a direct cost to their primary contract but treat another employee’s identical training as an indirect cost, you’re creating an audit finding. The DCAA expects consistent treatment of similar costs.

The rule of thumb: if an expense can be specifically identified with a single contract and removing that contract would eliminate that expense, it’s likely direct. If the expense would continue even if you lost a particular contract because it supports your overall operations, it’s likely indirect. When in doubt, document your reasoning—the DCAA values consistency and logic more than any particular classification choice.

Principle 2: Accurate Cost Allocation

Once you’ve classified costs as direct or indirect, you must allocate them to contracts using a rational, consistent methodology. Cost allocation is how you determine what portion of your indirect costs should be charged to each contract.

The concept is straightforward: if your business has $500,000 in annual overhead costs (rent, utilities, administrative salaries, etc.) and you work on five contracts, you need a fair method to spread those $500,000 in costs across those five contracts based on the benefit each contract receives from your overhead infrastructure.

Allocation bases are the denominators you use for this calculation. The most common allocation bases in government contracting are:

  • Direct Labor Hours: Total hours employees spend on direct contract work
  • Direct Labor Dollars: Total wages paid for direct contract work
  • Total Cost Input: All direct costs (labor, materials, subcontracts, etc.)

For example, if you choose direct labor dollars as your allocation base and Contract A represents 35% of your total direct labor dollars, then Contract A would be allocated 35% of your overhead costs (35% of $500,000 = $175,000).

The key is selecting an allocation base that reasonably reflects the causal or beneficial relationship between your indirect costs and your contracts. If you’re a labor-intensive professional services firm where contracts primarily consume employee time, direct labor hours or dollars makes sense. If you’re a manufacturing contractor where material costs dominate, total cost input might be more appropriate.

Indirect cost pools are the buckets where you accumulate different types of indirect costs before allocation. Most government contractors use a three-tier structure:

  • Fringe Benefits: Employee-related costs like health insurance, retirement contributions, and payroll taxes
  • Overhead: Facility costs, administrative salaries, supplies, utilities—costs related to running your operations
  • General & Administrative (G&A): Executive salaries, accounting, legal, business development—costs related to managing the entire business

Each pool typically has its own allocation base. Fringe might allocate based on direct labor dollars. Overhead might allocate based on direct labor hours. G&A might allocate based on total cost input. The structure depends on your business model and what creates the most reasonable allocation.

Overhead rates are calculated by dividing your indirect cost pool by your allocation base. If you have $500,000 in overhead costs and $1,000,000 in direct labor dollars, your overhead rate is 50%. This means for every dollar of direct labor you charge to a contract, you also charge 50 cents of overhead.

Government contractors typically operate on provisional rates—estimates of what indirect rates will be for the year—and then reconcile to actual rates after year-end. If your provisional overhead rate was 50% but your actual costs resulted in a 48% rate, you owe the government a refund for the difference. If actual costs resulted in a 52% rate, the government owes you additional money. This reconciliation happens through the incurred cost submission process.

The DCAA pays close attention to cost allocation because it’s an area where contractors can manipulate numbers. Choosing allocation bases that shift costs toward more lucrative contracts, changing methodologies mid-year without disclosure, or failing to update rates regularly are all red flags. Your allocation methodology must be DCAA compliant, documented in writing, applied consistently, and defensible with clear logic.

Principle 3: Allowable vs. Unallowable Costs

Not all business expenses can be charged to government contracts. FAR Part 31 provides explicit guidance on which costs are allowable, which are expressly unallowable, and which require special handling. Understanding these distinctions prevents costly audit findings and potential false claims allegations.

Allowable costs are reasonable, allocable to the contract, and comply with FAR cost principles. Most ordinary business expenses fall into this category: employee salaries, rent, utilities, necessary supplies, business insurance, professional development, and similar costs that any business would incur.

Expressly unallowable costs are specifically prohibited by FAR Part 31.205. These include:

  • Entertainment costs (31.205-14): Tickets to sporting events, amusement, concerts, theater, or social events cannot be charged to government contracts, even if they have a business purpose.
  • Alcoholic beverages (31.205-51): Any costs related to alcohol are unallowable, whether purchased for client entertainment or employee celebrations.
  • Lobbying costs (31.205-22): Expenses related to influencing legislation or government policy are unallowable, with limited exceptions for specific technical discussions.
  • Certain legal costs (31.205-47): Legal fees related to defending fraud allegations, prosecuting claims against the government, or patent infringement are unallowable or limited.
  • Public relations and advertising costs (31.205-1): General brand advertising and public relations are unallowable. Only specific types of advertising (recruiting, contract performance notification) are allowable.
  • Bad debts (31.205-3): Write-offs of uncollectible accounts cannot be charged to government contracts.
  • Contributions and donations (31.205-8): Charitable contributions are unallowable.

The consequences of charging expressly unallowable costs to government contracts are severe. At minimum, you’ll face audit findings and be required to repay the costs with interest. In egregious cases, you could face False Claims Act liability, suspension from government contracting, or criminal charges. Even innocent mistakes can trigger significant penalties if the DCAA determines your accounting system failed to prevent unallowable costs from being charged to contracts.

This is why proper chart of accounts structure is critical. Your accounting system should have specific account codes for unallowable costs, making it impossible to accidentally charge them to government contracts. For example, create a dedicated “Entertainment – Unallowable” account code that is excluded from all contract cost reports. When an employee submits an expense report including a baseball game, your accounting team codes it to the unallowable account and it never touches contract costs.

Some costs have allocability limitations rather than being fully unallowable. For instance, compensation for executives and highly-paid employees may be subject to caps. Travel costs must be reasonable (you can’t fly first class when coach is available). The DCAA will scrutinize these costs for reasonableness even when they’re technically allowable.

The best practice is maintaining a clear separation between allowable and unallowable costs from the moment expenses are incurred. Train employees on what costs can and cannot be charged to projects. Implement expense report review procedures that flag potentially unallowable items. Structure your accounting system to segregate these costs automatically. Prevention is far easier and cheaper than remediation after an audit.

Principle 4: Consistent Cost Accounting Practices

Consistency is a core principle of government contract accounting. The DCAA expects contractors to apply the same accounting practices, allocation methodologies, and cost treatment decisions from period to period. You can’t change how you account for costs simply because a different treatment would be more favorable for a particular contract or time period.

This principle prevents contractors from manipulating accounting to shift costs toward more lucrative contracts or time periods. Without consistency requirements, a contractor could classify certain costs as direct on cost-reimbursement contracts (where they’re fully recoverable) but treat the same costs as indirect on fixed-price contracts (where they’re buried in overhead). This would unfairly burden one customer while benefiting another.

Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) formalize consistency requirements for larger contractors. CAS is a set of 19 detailed standards that govern cost accounting practices for contractors meeting certain thresholds:

  • Full CAS coverage applies to contracts exceeding $50 million in a fiscal year
  • Modified CAS coverage applies when a single contract exceeds $7.5 million (or $2 million for small businesses) but total contracts don’t reach $50 million

Even contractors not subject to CAS should follow its principles. The DCAA uses CAS concepts when evaluating whether any contractor’s accounting practices are adequate, regardless of contract size.

Key CAS standards contractors should understand:

  • CAS 401 (Consistency) requires consistent treatment of costs as direct or indirect
  • CAS 402 (Consistency in Allocating Costs) requires consistent allocation methodologies
  • CAS 405 (Accounting for Unallowable Costs) requires identifying and segregating unallowable costs
  • CAS 406 (Cost Accounting Period) requires using consistent fiscal periods

For CAS-covered contractors, you must file Disclosure Statements (DS-1 or DS-2 depending on coverage level) that explain your cost accounting practices in detail. Once filed, you’re bound to those practices unless you formally disclose changes and obtain approval. Undisclosed changes to accounting practices can trigger significant financial adjustments.

Even for contractors not subject to CAS, consistency matters. If you’re treating similar costs differently or changing methodologies without documentation and justification, you’re creating audit risk. The DCAA may question whether changes were made to manipulate contract costs rather than for legitimate business reasons.

Document your accounting policies in writing. When you need to change a practice—perhaps you’re restructuring your indirect cost pools or changing allocation bases because your business has evolved—document why the change is necessary and implement it consistently going forward. Transparency and consistency create audit resilience.

Principle 5: Adequate Timekeeping and Labor Distribution

Labor costs are typically the largest expense for government contractors, making accurate time tracking the absolute foundation of compliant accounting. The DCAA scrutinizes timekeeping more than any other area because labor mischarges create cascading problems throughout contract accounting—direct costs are misstated, indirect rates are wrong, and contract pricing becomes unreliable.

Daily time entry is not optional—it’s a DCAA requirement. Employees must record their time daily or contemporaneously with the work performed. “Contemporaneous” means at or near the time the work is done, not reconstructed days or weeks later from memory. The DCAA considers weekly or monthly time entry inadequate because it introduces estimation and reduces accuracy.

Why daily entry matters: memory degrades rapidly. By Friday afternoon, most people can’t accurately recall how they spent Monday morning. They round to convenient numbers (exactly 8 hours per day, neat divisions like 4 hours per project) rather than actual time worked. This estimation creates compliance violations because government contracts must be charged based on actual costs, not approximations.

Supervisory review and approval provides the oversight necessary to catch errors before they flow into accounting. The DCAA expects supervisors to review their team’s timesheets for reasonableness, accuracy, and proper charging. Supervisors should understand what work their team performed and verify time allocations make sense given project schedules and deliverables.

The review process must be documented. It’s not enough for a supervisor to glance at timesheets—there must be evidence they approved them. Many contractors fail DCAA floor checks because they can’t demonstrate supervisory approval actually occurred, even though they claim it did.

Labor distribution reports show how employee time is allocated across contracts, indirect activities, and leave. These reports are critical for:

  • Verifying direct labor charges to specific contracts are accurate
  • Calculating indirect rates based on actual labor consumption
  • Supporting invoices and contract claims
  • Demonstrating compliance during audits

A labor distribution report might show:

  • Employee A: 120 hours Contract X, 40 hours Overhead, 0 hours Leave
  • Employee B: 80 hours Contract X, 60 hours Contract Y, 20 hours Overhead, 0 hours Leave
  • Employee C: 0 hours Direct, 160 hours Overhead, 0 hours Leave

These reports feed into overhead rate calculations. If you have 1,000 direct labor hours and 200 overhead hours in a month, your overhead burden as a percentage of direct labor is 20% (200÷1,000). This data directly impacts what you bill customers and what you charge to contracts.

Correction procedures are equally important. When time entry errors occur—and they will—you must have a documented process for making corrections that maintains audit trail integrity. The DCAA expects:

  • Corrections can’t delete original entries—they must create new corrective entries
  • Someone other than the employee should approve corrections (typically a supervisor)
  • The reason for the correction must be documented
  • Corrections should be infrequent (frequent corrections suggest inadequate controls)

Many contractors fail this requirement by allowing employees to simply change their timesheets after submission. This creates gaps in the audit trail and suggests weak controls. Instead, implement a correction workflow where proposed changes are submitted, reviewed, approved, and documented before being entered.

Leave tracking must also be rigorous. The DCAA wants clear separation between time worked on contracts and paid time off. You cannot charge vacation, sick leave, or holidays directly to government contracts—these are indirect costs that flow through your fringe benefit pool. Contractors sometimes try to charge 40 hours per week to contracts even when employees took leave, essentially billing the government for time not worked. This is fraud.

Your timekeeping system should integrate directly with your accounting system, eliminating manual data transfers that introduce errors. Hour Timesheet provides this integration specifically for government contractors, ensuring time flows accurately from employee entry through supervisor approval and into accounting with a complete audit trail. This integration is critical—disconnected systems create reconciliation problems that trigger audit findings.

The bottom line: if your timekeeping system doesn’t support daily entry, supervisory approval, comprehensive audit trails, and leave tracking, you’re not ready for government contract work. Labor accounting is too important to handle with spreadsheets or commercial time tracking tools that weren’t designed for DCAA requirements.

Key Government Contract Accounting Requirements

Beyond the five core principles, several specific requirements define what your accounting system must deliver. These requirements flow from FAR regulations and DCAA audit guidance, and failure to meet them can result in your accounting system being deemed inadequate—a determination that can suspend contract payments and prevent you from winning new work.

Your Accounting System Must Be DCAA Compliant

The DCAA evaluates contractor accounting systems using Standard Form 1408 (SF 1408), the Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System. This form outlines six fundamental criteria your system must meet:

1. Proper Segregation of Direct and Indirect Costs
Your system must clearly distinguish between costs that benefit specific contracts (direct) and costs that benefit multiple contracts or your general operations (indirect). This segregation must be visible in your chart of accounts and consistently applied.

2. Identification and Exclusion of Unallowable Costs
Your system must prevent expressly unallowable costs from being charged to government contracts. This typically requires dedicated account codes for unallowable cost categories and controls that exclude these accounts from contract cost accumulation.

3. Accurate Cost Allocation
Your indirect costs must be accumulated in logical pools and allocated to contracts using rational, documented methodologies. The DCAA will evaluate whether your allocation bases reasonably reflect the relationship between indirect costs and contract benefits.

4. Accumulation of Costs by Contract
Your system must track direct costs by individual contract, allowing you to report costs for Contract A separately from Contract B. This job costing capability is fundamental—if you can’t track costs by contract, you can’t bill cost-reimbursement contracts or verify fixed-price contract profitability.

5. Interim Cost Summaries
You must be able to produce cost summaries monthly (or more frequently) showing cumulative contract costs to date. Contractors who can only generate annual cost reports fail this requirement because they can’t support interim billing or monitor contract performance.

6. Acceptable Reconciliation Between Books and Records
Your contract cost reports must reconcile to your general ledger. If you’re reporting $500,000 in costs on Contract X in your billing, your general ledger must show $500,000 in costs accumulated for Contract X. Disconnects between systems create audit findings.

If the DCAA determines your accounting system doesn’t meet these criteria, they’ll issue a finding of “inadequate accounting system.” This has serious consequences:

  • Payments on cost-reimbursement contracts may be suspended
  • You may be unable to win new contracts requiring preaward accounting system approval
  • You’ll face intense scrutiny on existing contracts
  • You must remediate the deficiencies and undergo re-audit before restrictions are lifted

Prevention is critical. Before pursuing government contracts, ensure your accounting system is properly structured. Many contractors start with QuickBooks or similar commercial software, which can meet DCAA requirements if properly configured—but configuration is key. Simply using QuickBooks without DCAA-specific setup will fail audit.

This is why many contractors turn to DCAA compliant accounting systems purpose-built for government contracting. These systems implement required controls and reporting automatically, reducing the risk of inadequate system findings.

You Need an Adequate Timekeeping System

Your timekeeping system is separate from, but deeply integrated with, your accounting system. The DCAA conducts floor checks—on-site reviews of timekeeping practices—to verify your time tracking meets requirements:

  • Daily or contemporaneous time entry by all employees
  • Actual time worked, not estimates or budgets
  • Supervisory review and approval with documented evidence
  • Comprehensive audit trail showing original entries and any corrections
  • Signed timesheets (electronic signatures acceptable) acknowledging accuracy
  • After-the-fact changes prohibited or strictly controlled with documented justifications

The integration between timekeeping and accounting is critical. Time data must flow into your accounting system to:

  • Create direct labor charges to specific contracts
  • Calculate actual direct labor hours for overhead rate calculations
  • Support payroll processing
  • Generate labor distribution reports

Disconnected systems—where employees track time in one system and someone manually transfers data to accounting—create compliance risk. Manual transfers introduce errors, create reconciliation problems, and weaken audit trails. The DCAA expects seamless integration where approved time automatically flows into job costing.

Many contractors fail floor checks because their timekeeping systems are inadequate, even when their accounting systems are properly structured. Spreadsheets, basic time clocks, and commercial time tracking apps typically don’t provide the controls and audit trails the DCAA requires. Purpose-built solutions like Hour Timesheet were designed specifically to pass floor checks by enforcing daily entry, documenting supervisory approval, and maintaining immutable audit trails.

You Must Track Indirect Costs Separately

Your indirect cost pools must be structured logically and tracked separately from direct costs. Most contractors use a three-tier structure:

Fringe Benefits Pool
Accumulate employee-related indirect costs:

  • Health insurance
  • Retirement plan contributions
  • Payroll taxes (employer portion)
  • Life insurance, disability insurance
  • Worker’s compensation insurance (allocated portion)

Fringe typically allocates based on direct labor dollars or direct labor hours. If your fringe pool totals $200,000 and you have $800,000 in direct labor costs, your fringe rate is 25% ($200,000 ÷ $800,000).

Overhead Pool
Accumulate costs related to running your direct operations:

  • Rent and utilities
  • Administrative and support staff salaries
  • Office supplies and equipment
  • Indirect labor (project managers, quality control)
  • Depreciation on equipment
  • Maintenance and repairs
  • Small tools and supplies

Overhead typically allocates based on direct labor hours or dollars. If your overhead pool is $500,000 and you have 10,000 direct labor hours, your overhead rate is $50 per direct labor hour.

General & Administrative (G&A) Pool
Accumulate costs related to managing the entire business:

  • Executive salaries
  • Accounting and finance staff
  • Legal fees
  • Business development and marketing (allowable portions)
  • Corporate insurance
  • Professional services (consultants, auditors)

G&A typically allocates based on total cost input (all direct costs plus overhead, excluding G&A itself). If your G&A pool is $300,000 and your total cost input is $2,000,000, your G&A rate is 15%.

Why separate pools matter: Different indirect costs have different relationships to contract work. Fringe benefits track directly with labor. Overhead relates to the effort of running projects. G&A relates to running the entire business. Using separate pools with appropriate allocation bases creates more accurate contract costing than lumping everything together.

Provisional vs. Final Rates: Government contractors typically operate on provisional rates—estimates of what indirect rates will be for the year. These provisional rates are used for interim billing. After year-end, you calculate actual rates based on actual costs and actual allocation bases, then reconcile:

  • If provisional rates were higher than actual rates, you owe the government a refund
  • If provisional rates were lower than actual rates, the government owes you additional payment

This reconciliation happens through the incurred cost submission (ICS), also called the incurred cost proposal. You must submit your ICS within six months of fiscal year-end, showing actual costs incurred and calculating final indirect rates. The DCAA audits your ICS to verify costs are allowable and properly allocated, potentially adjusting your rates if they find issues.

You Need Strong Internal Controls

Internal controls are the policies and procedures that ensure your accounting system produces accurate, reliable data. The DCAA evaluates whether you have adequate controls to prevent errors and detect fraud.

Segregation of duties means no single person should control all aspects of a transaction. For example:

  • The person who approves purchases shouldn’t be the same person who processes payments
  • The person who creates invoices shouldn’t be the same person who records cash receipts
  • The person who enters timesheets shouldn’t be able to approve their own time

This separation prevents fraud and errors. In small businesses where segregation is difficult, implement compensating controls like owner review of financial reports and bank reconciliations.

Approval authorities should be clearly defined. Who can approve expenditures? At what dollar levels? Who can approve timesheets? Who can approve journal entries? These approval requirements should be documented in writing and followed consistently.

Review and reconciliation procedures catch errors before they become problems:

  • Monthly bank reconciliations
  • Reconciliation between subledgers (job costing, accounts payable) and general ledger
  • Reconciliation between timekeeping and payroll
  • Review of contract costs versus budgets
  • Monthly indirect rate calculations to monitor provisional vs. actual rates

Documentation requirements ensure you can support every transaction:

  • Vendor invoices supporting accounts payable
  • Receiving documents supporting inventory
  • Purchase orders supporting commitments
  • Approved timesheets supporting labor charges
  • Contracts and task orders supporting revenue recognition

The DCAA expects you to maintain these documents for the life of the contract plus seven years. Electronic storage is acceptable, but documents must be readily retrievable.

Strong internal controls don’t just satisfy auditors—they protect your business. Controls prevent embezzlement, catch billing errors before you invoice customers, and identify cost overruns while you can still take corrective action.

Common Government Contract Accounting Mistakes

Even experienced contractors make accounting errors that trigger DCAA findings. Understanding these common mistakes helps you avoid them.

Mistake 1: Using Cash Basis Accounting

Many small businesses use cash basis accounting for simplicity and tax purposes. Cash basis records revenue when payment is received and expenses when paid. This works fine for commercial businesses and tax reporting.

Government contracts require accrual basis accounting. Accrual basis records revenue when earned (regardless of payment timing) and expenses when incurred (regardless of payment timing). This matching principle ensures contract costs reflect the period when work was performed, not when cash changed hands.

Why accrual matters for government contracts: Indirect rate calculations must reflect costs incurred during the fiscal year, not costs paid during the year. If you paid January rent in December, cash basis would record that rent in the wrong year, distorting your rates. Accrual basis records it in January when it belongs.

Similarly, cost-reimbursement contract billing must reflect costs incurred, not costs paid. You can bill for materials when received, not when you pay the vendor. You can bill for labor when performed, not when payroll runs.

How to transition: If you’re using cash basis for tax purposes, you can maintain two sets of books—cash basis for taxes, accrual basis for contract accounting. Most accounting software supports this with proper setup. Alternatively, transition entirely to accrual basis, which is generally recommended once you’re doing significant government contract work.

The key adjustments:

  • Record accounts payable for unpaid vendor invoices
  • Record accounts receivable for unbilled contract work
  • Accrue expenses like rent, insurance, and utilities at period-end
  • Defer prepaid expenses to match them to the correct period

Mistake 2: Inadequate Audit Trail

An adequate audit trail means you can trace any transaction from source documents through to financial reports, and reverse the process from financial reports back to source documents. Every transaction should show who entered it, when, and what supporting documentation exists.

Common audit trail failures:

  • Deleting transactions rather than creating reversing entries
  • Modifying historical records without documentation
  • Manual adjustments without explanation or approval
  • Missing source documents (no vendor invoice, no approved timesheet)
  • Disconnected systems where data transfers create gaps

The DCAA needs complete audit trails to verify costs are legitimate and properly recorded. If you can’t trace a labor charge from timesheet entry through supervisor approval to job costing to general ledger to customer invoice, you have an audit trail problem.

How to fix this:

  • Configure your accounting software to prevent deletion of posted transactions
  • Implement approval workflows for journal entries and adjustments
  • Maintain organized electronic or paper files of source documents
  • Use integrated systems where time, expenses, and accounting flow seamlessly
  • Train staff on documentation requirements

Mistake 3: Inconsistent Labor Charging

Labor mischarging is the most common DCAA finding. Contractors make several recurring mistakes:

Charging leave directly to contracts: When employees take vacation or sick leave, that time cannot be charged as direct labor to government contracts. Leave is an indirect cost that flows through your fringe benefit pool. Some contractors, wanting to hit 40 billable hours per week, charge leave directly to whatever contract the employee usually works on. This is fraud.

Estimating time instead of tracking actual: Employees must record actual time worked, not estimates based on budgets or percentages. If your timesheets show exactly 8 hours every day split into perfect percentages like 50/50 or 25/75, the DCAA will question whether this represents actual time or estimation.

Allowing backdated changes without controls: Employees can’t simply edit timesheets after submission without supervision and documentation. When Debbie realizes on Friday she coded Wednesday’s time to the wrong project, she can’t just change Wednesday’s entry—she needs supervisor approval and a documented reason for the correction.

Inconsistent treatment of similar employees: If you charge Employee A’s training as direct cost to their primary contract but treat Employee B’s identical training as an indirect cost, you’ve created inconsistency. Similar costs should receive similar treatment unless there’s a clear reason for different handling.

How to fix this:

  • Implement strict leave tracking that excludes leave hours from direct contract charging
  • Require daily time entry to reduce estimation
  • Implement approval-based correction workflows
  • Document your labor charging policies and train employees
  • Use timekeeping software designed for DCAA compliance (like Hour Timesheet) that enforces these rules

Mistake 4: Poor Indirect Cost Allocation

Indirect rate calculations create significant problems when contractors:

Use incorrect allocation bases: Your allocation base should reflect the causal or beneficial relationship between indirect costs and contracts. If you’re allocating rent based on revenue, you’re creating arbitrary allocation—rent doesn’t vary with revenue. Direct labor hours or square footage would be more logical.

Fail to update rates regularly: You should calculate actual indirect rates monthly to compare against provisional rates. Waiting until year-end to discover your provisional overhead rate was 45% but actual was 52% means you’ve underbilled customers all year. Monthly monitoring lets you adjust provisional rates if actual costs diverge significantly from budget.

Mix unallowable costs into indirect pools: Unallowable costs cannot flow through indirect rates to be charged to government contracts. If your G&A pool includes $50,000 in entertainment expenses, you must remove those unallowable costs before calculating your G&A rate. Failure to do this means you’re billing unallowable costs indirectly, which is just as problematic as billing them directly.

Use single indirect rate when multiple pools are needed: If you have both professional staff and administrative staff, using a single overhead rate treats them identically. But professional staff typically work directly on contracts while administrative staff work indirectly. You may need separate overhead pools or more sophisticated allocation methodologies.

How to fix this:

  • Review your allocation bases annually to ensure they remain appropriate as your business evolves
  • Calculate actual rates monthly and compare to provisional rates
  • Segregate unallowable costs from indirect pools
  • Consider whether your business needs multiple indirect cost pools
  • Document your indirect rate structure and allocation methodologies in your accounting manual

Mistake 5: Mixing Personal and Business Expenses

Contractors who use business accounts for personal expenses or vice versa create major DCAA red flags. The agency interprets this as weak internal controls and questions the reliability of your entire accounting system.

Common problems:

  • Using company credit cards for personal purchases then coding them as business expenses
  • Personal vehicle expenses claimed as business costs without adequate documentation
  • Home office deductions claimed without proper allocation between business and personal use
  • Family members on payroll performing little or no actual work

Even legitimate mixed-use expenses require careful allocation. If you work from home, you can allocate a portion of rent, utilities, and internet to business—but you must have documentation supporting the allocation percentage and be consistent.

How to fix this:

  • Maintain complete separation between personal and business finances
  • If business credit cards are used for personal expenses, code them to owner draw/equity, not business expense accounts
  • Document all allocations between business and personal use with contemporaneous records
  • Ensure all employees (including family members) have documented job descriptions and perform actual work
  • Review expense reports carefully to identify and recode personal expenses

The DCAA views mixing personal and business expenses as a fundamental control failure. Even if the dollar amounts are small, this practice undermines auditor confidence in your entire accounting system.

How to Set Up Government Contract Accounting

If you’re preparing for government contract work, follow these implementation steps to establish a compliant accounting foundation.

Step 1: Choose DCAA Compliant Software

Your software selection is critical. You need systems that can:

  • Segregate direct from indirect costs
  • Track costs by individual contract
  • Maintain comprehensive audit trails
  • Support daily time entry with supervisory approval
  • Generate labor distribution reports
  • Calculate and track indirect rates
  • Integrate timekeeping with accounting

Generic accounting software like QuickBooks, Xero, or FreshBooks wasn’t designed for government contract requirements. These platforms can be configured for DCAA compliance, but it requires expertise and careful setup. Many contractors using commercial software fail DCAA audits because they don’t realize their configuration is inadequate.

Your options:

  • Purpose-built government contractor software (like Hour Timesheet for timekeeping, Deltek or Unanet for full ERP) provides built-in DCAA compliance
  • QuickBooks Desktop + Hour Timesheet combines commercial accounting with DCAA-compliant timekeeping through seamless integration
  • Properly configured commercial software can work if you have expertise in both the software and DCAA requirements

For detailed comparison of options, see our guide to DCAA compliant accounting systems.

The key: whatever you choose must integrate timekeeping with accounting. Disconnected systems create compliance risk and reconciliation headaches.

Step 2: Design Your Chart of Accounts Properly

Your chart of accounts is the foundation of your accounting system. For government contractors, structure it to support compliance:

Direct cost accounts by contract:

  • Create separate account numbers for each active contract
  • Use consistent numbering (e.g., 4000-series for direct labor, 5000-series for direct materials)
  • Include subaccounts for different direct cost types (labor, materials, subcontracts, travel)

Example structure:

  • 4100 – Direct Labor – Contract A
  • 4200 – Direct Labor – Contract B
  • 5100 – Direct Materials – Contract A
  • 5200 – Direct Materials – Contract B

Indirect cost pool accounts:

  • Create separate account ranges for Fringe, Overhead, and G&A pools
  • Within each pool, create detailed accounts for different cost types

Example structure:

  • 6100-6199: Fringe Benefits Pool (health insurance, retirement, payroll taxes)
  • 6200-6299: Overhead Pool (rent, utilities, indirect labor, supplies)
  • 6300-6399: G&A Pool (executive salaries, accounting, legal, marketing)

Unallowable cost accounts:

  • Create dedicated accounts for expressly unallowable costs
  • Use account naming that clearly identifies unallowability (e.g., “6950 – Entertainment – Unallowable”)
  • Configure reports to exclude these accounts from contract cost accumulation

Revenue accounts by contract:

  • Track revenue separately by contract to monitor profitability
  • Include both billed and unbilled revenue accounts for accrual basis reporting

A well-designed chart of accounts makes compliance easier by automatically segregating costs into the right categories. Resist the urge to oversimplify—proper granularity supports better analysis and cleaner audit trails.

Step 3: Establish Timekeeping Procedures

Document your timekeeping policies in writing and train all employees:

Daily entry policy:

  • Require employees to enter time daily or at least contemporaneously
  • Define “contemporaneous” (ideally same day, maximum 2-3 days)
  • Specify consequences for non-compliance

What employees must record:

  • Actual hours worked (not rounded to 8.0 per day)
  • Specific contract or indirect activity codes
  • Leave taken (vacation, sick, holidays)
  • Brief descriptions of work performed (optional but helpful)

Approval workflow:

  • Define who approves whose time (typically direct supervisor)
  • Require approval before time flows to accounting/payroll
  • Specify approval timing (e.g., within 2 business days of submission)
  • Document how approvers verify accuracy

Correction procedures:

  • Prohibit direct editing of submitted timesheets
  • Require correction requests with justification
  • Require supervisor approval of corrections
  • Maintain audit trail of original entry and correction

System requirements:

  • Use software that enforces daily entry Hour Timesheet was built specifically for this
  • Configure the system to lock prior periods after payroll processes
  • Enable audit logging to track all entries and changes

Train employees during onboarding and annually thereafter. Make it clear that accurate time charging is a compliance requirement, not optional.

Step 4: Create Internal Controls

Document your internal control procedures:

Approval authorities:

  • Who can approve purchases at what dollar levels?
  • Who can approve journal entries?
  • Who can approve timesheets?
  • Who can approve expense reports?

Segregation of duties:

  • Separate purchasing from payment processing
  • Separate billing from cash receipt recording
  • Separate timesheet entry from payroll processing
  • For small businesses where full segregation isn’t possible, implement owner review of key reports and reconciliations

Monthly close procedures:

  • Bank reconciliations
  • Subledger to general ledger reconciliation
  • Contract cost review vs. budgets
  • Indirect rate calculations (actual vs. provisional)
  • Review of aged accounts receivable and payable

Documentation standards:

  • What supporting documentation is required for each transaction type?
  • How long are documents retained?
  • Where are documents stored (electronic vs. physical)?
  • Who is responsible for maintaining document files?

Written procedures serve two purposes: they ensure consistent application of controls and they demonstrate to auditors that you have a structured approach to financial management.

Step 5: Document Your Policies

Create an accounting policies and procedures manual that documents:

  • Your fiscal year and accounting period structure
  • Chart of accounts organization and definitions
  • Direct vs. indirect cost classification criteria
  • Indirect cost pool structure and allocation bases
  • Unallowable cost identification and exclusion procedures
  • Timekeeping requirements and procedures
  • Internal control procedures
  • Month-end and year-end close procedures
  • Contract costing and billing procedures

This manual serves multiple purposes:

  • Training document for new accounting staff
  • Reference guide for existing staff
  • Evidence of systematic approach for DCAA auditors
  • Basis for consistency when questions arise

Update your manual annually or whenever you make significant changes to your accounting practices. If you’re subject to CAS, your Disclosure Statement should align with your accounting manual.

Step 6: Train Your Team

Everyone needs training on government contract accounting requirements:

Accounting staff need deep training on:

  • Government contract accounting principles
  • Your specific chart of accounts structure
  • Internal control procedures
  • How to generate required reports
  • How to respond to DCAA audits

Managers and supervisors need training on:

  • Timesheet review and approval requirements
  • How to identify labor mischarging
  • Expense report review for unallowable costs
  • Their role in maintaining internal controls

All employees need training on:

  • Daily time entry requirements
  • How to code time to contracts vs. indirect activities
  • Leave reporting requirements
  • What costs cannot be charged to government contracts
  • Expense report requirements

Conduct initial training during onboarding and refresher training annually. Document that training occurred (sign-in sheets, completion certificates) as evidence of your compliance efforts.

Training creates a compliance culture where employees understand why these requirements matter, not just what the requirements are. When employees understand that improper time charging can lead to False Claims Act liability, they take their responsibilities more seriously.

Cost Accounting Standards (CAS): What You Need to Know

Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) are a set of 19 detailed accounting standards that apply to certain government contractors. While not all contractors are subject to CAS, understanding its principles is valuable because the DCAA uses CAS concepts when evaluating any contractor’s accounting system.

When Do CAS Requirements Apply?

CAS coverage depends on contract dollar thresholds:

Full CAS Coverage:

  • Applies when your business receives a single CAS-covered contract exceeding $50 million
  • Requires compliance with all 19 CAS standards
  • Requires filing a CASB Disclosure Statement (DS-2)

Modified CAS Coverage:

  • Applies when you receive a single CAS-covered contract exceeding $7.5 million (or $2 million for small businesses)
  • BUT your total CAS-covered contracts don’t exceed $50 million in your fiscal year
  • Requires compliance with five specific CAS standards (401, 402, 405, 406, and 407)
  • Requires filing a CASB Disclosure Statement (DS-1)

CAS-Exempt:

  • Contracts under the thresholds above
  • Firm-fixed-price contracts under $2 million
  • Contracts for commercial items
  • Small businesses receiving contracts under $2 million

Even if you’re CAS-exempt, the principles behind CAS standards represent best practices for government contract accounting.

Key CAS Standards

While there are 19 CAS standards total, several are particularly important for understanding government contract accounting:

CAS 401 – Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating, and Reporting Costs Requires that you use the same cost accounting practices for estimating, accumulating, and reporting costs. If you estimate a proposal treating training as indirect, you must accumulate actual training costs as indirect, and report them as indirect. You can’t change treatment arbitrarily based on what’s most advantageous.

CAS 402 – Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for the Same Purpose Requires that similar costs be treated consistently. You can’t charge one employee’s travel as direct to their primary contract while treating another employee’s identical travel as indirect. Similar costs in similar circumstances should receive similar accounting treatment.

CAS 405 – Accounting for Unallowable Costs Requires identifying unallowable costs and excluding them from billing, claims, and proposals. You must have procedures to identify expressly unallowable costs and segregate them in your accounting system.

CAS 406 – Cost Accounting Period Requires using a fiscal year as your cost accounting period and maintaining consistency in that period. You can’t change fiscal years arbitrarily to manipulate indirect rates.

CAS 407 – Use of Standard Costs for Direct Material and Direct Labor Allows use of standard costs (predetermined amounts) rather than actual costs for certain purposes, but requires variance analysis and adjustments.

Disclosure Statements

CAS-covered contractors must file Disclosure Statements describing their cost accounting practices in detail:

DS-1 (Modified CAS): Simpler form focusing on the five CAS standards applicable to modified coverage

DS-2 (Full CAS): Comprehensive form describing all cost accounting practices

The Disclosure Statement binds you to the practices described. If you want to change a practice, you must file a formal disclosure of the change. Undisclosed changes can trigger cost accounting practice changes that require retroactive contract price adjustments—potentially costing you millions if the change is deemed noncompliant.

Why CAS Matters Even If You’re Exempt

While CAS formally applies only to larger contractors, its principles represent logical, defensible cost accounting practices. The DCAA uses CAS concepts when evaluating any contractor’s system:

  • Consistency (CAS 401, 402)
  • Excluding unallowable costs (CAS 405)
  • Using rational allocation bases (CAS 410)
  • Properly structuring indirect cost pools (CAS 418)

Following CAS principles, even when not required, creates a stronger, more defensible accounting system. When audit questions arise, you can reference CAS standards to support your practices, demonstrating you’re following recognized government contracting principles.

Working with DCAA: What to Expect

The Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is the government organization that audits contractor accounting systems and contract costs. Understanding the DCAA’s role and how to work with them productively is essential for government contractors.

The DCAA’s Role

The DCAA performs several types of audits:

Preaward Accounting System Survey: Before awarding certain contracts (particularly cost-reimbursement contracts), the contracting officer may request a DCAA review of your accounting system using SF 1408. The DCAA evaluates whether your system meets the six criteria for adequacy. If your system is inadequate, you won’t receive the contract.

Floor Checks: DCAA floor checks are on-site reviews of your timekeeping practices. Auditors visit unannounced, interview employees about how they track time, review timesheets and supporting documentation, and verify your timekeeping system meets requirements. Floor checks typically last 1-2 days.

Incurred Cost Audits: After fiscal year-end, you submit an incurred cost proposal showing actual costs incurred on cost-reimbursement contracts. The DCAA audits this submission to verify costs are allowable, allocable, and reasonable. They examine supporting documentation, test internal controls, and may adjust costs if they find issues.

Proposal Audits: When you submit cost proposals for new contracts, the DCAA may audit your proposed costs to ensure they’re based on reasonable estimates and comply with FAR requirements.

Contract Closeout Audits: When contracts are completed, the DCAA may audit final costs to ensure proper closeout and determine if any adjustments are needed.

Preparing for a DCAA Audit

Preparation is the key to successful DCAA audits:

Maintain organized documentation:

  • Keep all source documents readily accessible (vendor invoices, timesheets, contracts, purchase orders)
  • Organize files logically (by fiscal year, by contract, by transaction type)
  • Use electronic document management if possible for quick retrieval
  • Maintain documents for contract life plus seven years

Know your accounting system:

  • Understand how your chart of accounts is structured and why
  • Be able to explain your indirect cost allocation methodologies
  • Know how time flows from employee entry through approval to accounting
  • Understand your internal control procedures

Reconcile everything:

  • Ensure contract cost reports reconcile to general ledger
  • Ensure timekeeping hours reconcile to payroll hours
  • Ensure indirect rate calculations use correct bases
  • Don’t wait for audit requests—maintain ongoing reconciliation

Assign a point person:

  • Designate someone (usually CFO or controller) as primary DCAA contact
  • This person coordinates document requests and auditor access
  • Having a single point person prevents confusion and mixed messages

How to Respond to Audit Findings

When the DCAA identifies issues, respond professionally and promptly:

Understand the finding:

  • Ask questions if you don’t understand what the auditor found
  • Request specific examples and supporting analysis
  • Don’t get defensive—focus on understanding the issue

Provide additional information:

  • Sometimes findings result from auditor misunderstanding
  • Provide additional documentation or explanation that clarifies the situation
  • Be factual and professional in your responses

Agree when appropriate:

  • If the finding is legitimate, acknowledge it
  • Explain how it occurred
  • Outline corrective actions you’ll implement

Disagree when justified:

  • If you believe the finding is incorrect, professionally explain why
  • Provide supporting documentation and regulatory citations
  • Request a meeting to discuss the issue if needed

Implement corrective actions:

  • Fix identified problems promptly
  • Document corrective action plans in writing
  • Demonstrate in follow-up audits that issues were resolved

Building a Good Relationship with DCAA

While the DCAA is an audit agency (not a consultant), you can build a productive working relationship:

Be responsive: When auditors request documents or information, provide it promptly. Delays create suspicion that you’re hiding problems.

Be cooperative: Make space available for on-site audits. Treat auditors professionally. Answer questions directly and honestly.

Be organized: Nothing impresses auditors more than a contractor who has documentation ready, systems well-organized, and explanations clear. Preparation demonstrates control.

Be proactive: Fix problems when you discover them, even before an audit. Self-reporting issues and showing corrective actions demonstrates good faith.

Don’t be defensive: View audits as opportunities to strengthen your system, not personal attacks. Accept constructive feedback and implement improvements.

The DCAA’s job is protecting taxpayer interests by ensuring contract costs are legitimate. When you maintain compliant systems and respond professionally to audits, most interactions are straightforward and not adversarial.

Government Contract Accounting Best Practices

Beyond meeting minimum requirements, these best practices create stronger, more audit-resilient accounting systems:

Implement Systems Before You Need Them

Don’t wait until you win your first contract to establish compliant accounting. Implement proper systems while you’re pursuing opportunities so you’re ready from day one. Trying to implement systems while performing contract work is chaotic—you’re learning compliance requirements while also trying to deliver on contracts. You’ll make mistakes that trigger audit findings.

Set up DCAA-compliant timekeeping, structure your chart of accounts properly, establish indirect rate structures, and document procedures before contract award. This preparation also makes you more competitive—contracting officers favor contractors with adequate accounting systems already in place.

Reconcile Indirect Rates Monthly

Don’t wait until year-end to calculate actual indirect rates. Perform monthly calculations comparing actual rates to provisional rates. If you budgeted 50% overhead but actual is running 55%, you need to know early so you can:

  • Increase provisional rates going forward (with customer notification)
  • Investigate why overhead is higher than expected
  • Take corrective action if possible
  • Avoid year-end surprises

Monthly rate monitoring also helps you recognize pricing problems early. If your overhead is spiking, perhaps you need to adjust your bidding strategy or reduce indirect costs.

Document Everything

“If it’s not documented, it didn’t happen” is the DCAA’s unofficial motto. Document:

  • Why you made accounting policy decisions
  • How you calculated indirect rates
  • Why you changed allocation bases
  • How you determined cost classification
  • Meeting notes discussing contract accounting issues
  • Training provided to employees

This documentation protects you during audits. When auditors question a decision from three years ago, documentation shows your reasoning and demonstrates systematic decision-making rather than arbitrary choices.

Separate Personal from Business Expenses

Maintain absolute separation between personal and business finances. This practice:

  • Strengthens internal controls
  • Increases auditor confidence in your system
  • Simplifies tax compliance
  • Protects you from commingling issues

Even if you’re a small business owner using personal credit cards occasionally for business expenses, code them correctly and reimburse yourself formally. Don’t muddy the waters between business and personal.

Train Employees from Day One

Don’t assume employees understand government contract accounting requirements—train them during onboarding:

  • Why daily time entry matters
  • How to code time correctly
  • What constitutes unallowable costs
  • Why accuracy is critical (compliance, not just convenience)

Employees who understand the “why” behind requirements follow them more consistently than those who just get a list of rules.

Use Purpose-Built Software

While you can configure commercial accounting software for DCAA compliance, purpose-built solutions make compliance easier and reduce risk. Hour Timesheet, for example, was designed specifically to meet DCAA timekeeping requirements—it enforces daily entry, documents supervisory approval, maintains audit trails, and generates labor distribution reports automatically.

Using purpose-built tools means:

  • Compliance features work out-of-the-box
  • Updates incorporate changing DCAA guidance
  • Support teams understand government contracting requirements
  • Integration with accounting is designed for contractor workflows

The cost difference between generic and purpose-built software is usually modest, and the reduced compliance risk justifies the investment.

Work with Government Contractor CPAs

Not all accountants understand government contract accounting. Work with a CPA firm experienced in government contracting who can:

  • Review your accounting system setup
  • Advise on indirect cost structures
  • Prepare your incurred cost submissions
  • Represent you during DCAA audits
  • Help you respond to audit findings

Experienced government contractor CPAs have relationships with DCAA auditors, understand what triggers findings, and can help you avoid common mistakes. Their fees are an investment in compliance and audit protection.

Stay Current on FAR Changes and DCAA Guidance

FAR regulations and DCAA audit guidance evolve. The DCAA periodically issues Information for Contractors (IFC) bulletins explaining their interpretation of requirements. Major FAR changes can affect allowability, allocation, or reporting requirements.

Stay informed by:

  • Subscribing to government contracting newsletters
  • Attending industry association webinars (like NCMA or NCCA)
  • Working with consultants or CPAs who track regulatory changes
  • Reviewing DCAA’s public guidance documents

Don’t wait for an auditor to tell you about new requirements—proactive monitoring lets you adjust before issues arise.

Conclusion: Government Contract Accounting Isn’t Optional

Government contract accounting is fundamentally different from commercial accounting. The stakes are higher, the rules are stricter, and the consequences of noncompliance are severe. Contractors who treat government work like commercial work inevitably face DCAA audit findings, payment suspensions, and potential fraud allegations.

But contractors who invest in proper systems from the beginning find government contracting predictable and profitable. When you understand the five core principles—cost classification, cost allocation, allowability, consistency, and adequate timekeeping—the details become manageable. When you implement compliant systems before you need them, you avoid the chaos of trying to fix problems during audits.

The investment in proper accounting systems pays for itself quickly. DCAA-compliant timekeeping prevents labor mischarging that could trigger False Claims Act liability. Proper indirect rate structures ensure you’re not losing money on contracts because overhead was underestimated. Strong internal controls catch errors before they become audit findings. The cost of Hour Timesheet or similar tools is trivial compared to the cost of suspended contract payments or remediation after a failed audit.

Start with the right foundation. Structure your chart of accounts for government contracting. Implement daily timekeeping with supervisory approval and comprehensive audit trails. Segregate unallowable costs. Document your policies and procedures. Train your team on why compliance matters, not just what the rules are.

Then monitor continuously. Calculate indirect rates monthly. Reconcile contract costs to general ledger. Review timesheets for accuracy and reasonableness. Keep documentation organized and readily accessible. Treat every day as though a DCAA auditor might arrive tomorrow—because they might.

Next Steps: Strengthen Your Accounting Foundation

Ready to ensure your accounting system meets government contract requirements?

Government contract accounting doesn’t have to be overwhelming. With the right knowledge, proper systems, and consistent practices, you can build an accounting foundation that not only satisfies DCAA requirements but also provides the financial visibility you need to grow your contracting business profitably.

Top 5 DCAA Compliant Accounting Systems: What Makes Them Actually Compliant

Choosing the wrong accounting system can cost government contractors everything. A failed DCAA audit doesn’t just mean embarrassment—it means suspended payments, contract termination, and in severe cases, allegations of fraud. Yet every year, contractors discover too late that their “DCAA compliant” software doesn’t actually meet the Defense Contract Audit Agency’s strict requirements.

The problem? Many accounting systems claim DCAA compliance in their marketing materials, but compliance isn’t about checking a box. It’s about demonstrating adequate internal controls, maintaining comprehensive audit trails, and proving your timekeeping and labor distribution systems can withstand scrutiny. Not all software is built to handle this burden.

In this guide, we’ll break down what actually makes an accounting system DCAA compliant, then evaluate the top five systems that government contractors rely on. Whether you’re a small business pursuing your first contract or an established contractor looking to upgrade, you’ll learn which solution fits your specific needs—and which expensive mistakes to avoid.

What Makes an Accounting System DCAA Compliant?

DCAA compliance isn’t a certification or badge you can earn. Instead, it’s a framework of requirements outlined in the Standard Form 1408 (SF 1408), also known as the Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System. The DCAA evaluates whether your accounting system provides adequate internal controls to ensure costs charged to government contracts are allowable, allocable, and reasonable.

Here are the core requirements your accounting system must meet:

Proper Segregation of Direct and Indirect Costs
Your system must clearly distinguish between costs that can be directly charged to a specific contract (direct costs) and costs that benefit multiple contracts or your general operations (indirect costs). This separation must be maintained consistently and be easily auditable.

Accurate Labor Distribution
You need a reliable method for tracking how employee time is distributed across contracts, indirect activities, and leave. The DCAA requires that labor charges are based on actual time worked, not estimates or budgets. Your timekeeping system must integrate with your accounting system to ensure labor costs flow accurately into job costing.

Comprehensive Audit Trail
Every transaction must be traceable from source documents through to financial reports. This means your system must track who entered data, when they entered it, and any modifications made. The audit trail must be tamper-proof—you can’t allow users to delete or modify historical records without leaving a clear record of the change.

Timely Recording of Costs
Costs must be recorded in the accounting period when they’re incurred, not when they’re paid. This accrual accounting approach ensures that contract costs reflect the true timing of expenses, which is essential for accurate indirect rate calculations.

Exclusion of Unallowable Costs
Your system must prevent unallowable costs (like entertainment, certain lobbying expenses, or alcoholic beverages) from being charged to government contracts. This typically requires specific account codes and controls that flag or block these costs from government jobs.

Compliance with Cost Accounting Standards (CAS)
For contracts subject to CAS, your system must maintain consistency in how you estimate, accumulate, and report costs. This includes your methods for allocating indirect costs and calculating overhead rates.

The challenge many contractors face is that general-purpose accounting software like QuickBooks or Xero was never designed with these specific requirements in mind. While you can sometimes configure these systems to meet DCAA standards, it requires extensive customization, constant vigilance, and often fails during a floor check—the DCAA’s on-site review of your accounting system.

Now let’s look at five accounting systems that were either purpose-built for DCAA compliance or can be configured to meet these strict requirements.


1. Hour Timesheet: Purpose-Built for DCAA Compliance

What It Is
Hour Timesheet is a cloud-based timekeeping and job costing system designed specifically for government contractors. Unlike general accounting software that tries to serve every industry, Hour Timesheet was built from the ground up to meet DCAA requirements without requiring contractors to become accounting experts.

DCAA Compliance Features

Hour Timesheet addresses every core DCAA requirement through features that work together seamlessly:

Immutable Audit Trail: Every timesheet entry, approval, and correction is permanently logged with user identification and timestamps. Supervisors can’t delete time entries—they can only add corrective entries that create a clear paper trail. If an employee tries to change a submitted timesheet, the system requires supervisor approval and documents the change reason.

Labor Distribution Reporting: The system generates labor distribution reports that show exactly how employee hours are allocated across multiple contracts, indirect activities, and leave types. These reports integrate directly with QuickBooks Desktop or can export to other accounting systems, ensuring your labor costs flow accurately into job costing without manual data entry.

Time Entry Validation: Hour Timesheet enforces daily time entry and prevents retroactive changes beyond your company’s policy timeframe. Employees can’t estimate their time at the end of the week—they must account for every day. The system also prevents the common DCAA violation of “rounding” time to neat numbers.

Approval Workflows: Supervisors must review and approve timesheets before time flows to payroll or accounting. The system tracks who approved what and when, creating the oversight documentation the DCAA expects to see.

Leave Management: Hour Timesheet tracks leave accruals and usage with the detail the DCAA requires. When an employee takes PTO, it’s clearly marked and separated from billable contract hours, preventing the compliance violation of charging leave time directly to government contracts.

Best For
Hour Timesheet is ideal for small to mid-size government contractors (10-500 employees) who need turnkey DCAA compliance without enterprise-level complexity. It’s particularly valuable for:

  • Companies using QuickBooks Desktop who need compliant timekeeping integration
  • Contractors facing their first DCAA audit and needing to quickly establish proper controls
  • Professional services firms (engineering, consulting, IT services) where labor is the primary cost
  • Businesses that want their employees to track time via web or mobile apps without training overhead

Integration Capabilities
Hour Timesheet integrates natively with QuickBooks Desktop (Pro, Premier, and Enterprise), automatically syncing time data to create payroll records and job costing entries. For contractors using other accounting systems, Hour Timesheet exports detailed timesheet data in formats compatible with Deltek, Unanet, ADP, Paychex, and other platforms.

Pricing
Hour Timesheet uses transparent per-user pricing starting at $8 per user per month, with discounts for annual billing. There are no hidden setup fees, and the company offers a 30-day free trial. For a 50-person company, you’re looking at roughly $400/month—significantly less expensive than enterprise ERP solutions while delivering the DCAA-specific functionality most contractors actually need.

Why It Ranks #1
Hour Timesheet earns the top spot because it solves the specific problem government contractors face: achieving DCAA compliance without overhauling their entire accounting system. While enterprise ERPs like Deltek offer more features, most contractors don’t need manufacturing modules or complex project accounting. They need bulletproof timekeeping and labor distribution—and that’s exactly what Hour Timesheet delivers, at a fraction of the cost and complexity.


2. Deltek Costpoint: Enterprise ERP for Large Contractors

What It Is
Deltek Costpoint is a comprehensive enterprise resource planning (ERP) system designed specifically for government contractors and professional services firms. It’s the industry standard for large defense contractors and has been around for decades, with deep functionality that covers everything from project accounting to manufacturing cost tracking.

DCAA Compliance Features

Costpoint was built with DCAA compliance as a core design principle:

Complete Accounting System: Unlike Hour Timesheet, which focuses on timekeeping and job costing, Costpoint handles your entire accounting operation—general ledger, accounts payable, accounts receivable, project accounting, billing, and financial reporting. This integrated approach means all your DCAA compliance requirements are managed within a single system.

Sophisticated Labor Management: Costpoint’s labor module tracks time at a granular level, supporting complex scenarios like multiple labor categories, burden structures, and union rules. It handles situations where employees work on multiple contracts with different billing rates and overhead structures.

CAS Compliance: For contractors subject to Cost Accounting Standards, Costpoint provides built-in tools to maintain consistency in cost accounting practices. It can handle multiple indirect cost pools, complex allocation bases, and the detailed reporting CAS requires.

Government Billing: Costpoint generates invoices in formats required by various government agencies, including WAWF (Wide Area Workflow) submissions and progress payment requests. This integration between your accounting system and billing reduces errors and speeds up cash flow.

Best For
Deltek Costpoint is designed for large government contractors (typically 500+ employees) with complex needs:

  • Defense contractors with manufacturing operations
  • Companies managing hundreds of simultaneous contracts
  • Firms subject to Cost Accounting Standards (CAS)
  • Contractors who need sophisticated revenue recognition and project accounting

Considerations

The power of Costpoint comes with significant tradeoffs:

Cost: Licensing fees often start at $100,000+ for initial implementation, with annual maintenance fees of 18-20% of the license cost. Smaller contractors often can’t justify this investment.

Implementation Time: Expect 6-12 months (or longer) to fully implement Costpoint. You’ll need dedicated project managers and often external consultants to configure the system properly.

Complexity: Costpoint’s extensive functionality means a steep learning curve. You’ll need accounting staff who understand both government contracting and the software’s intricate modules.

Overhead: The system requires IT infrastructure, whether on-premises servers or cloud hosting, plus dedicated administrators to maintain it.

Why It Ranks #2
Costpoint is an exceptional tool for large contractors who need its enterprise capabilities. However, most small to mid-size contractors are better served by more focused, affordable solutions. It ranks second because while it delivers unmatched functionality for complex organizations, that power is overkill—and prohibitively expensive—for the majority of government contractors.


3. Unanet: Mid-Market Project-Based ERP

What It Is
Unanet (specifically Unanet GovCon) is a cloud-based ERP solution designed for government contractors and project-driven professional services firms. It sits in the middle ground between focused tools like Hour Timesheet and enterprise solutions like Deltek, offering more functionality than specialized timekeeping software but with less complexity than full enterprise ERPs.

DCAA Compliance Features

Unanet provides solid DCAA compliance capabilities:

Integrated Timekeeping and Accounting: Like Costpoint, Unanet combines time tracking with project accounting, eliminating the need for separate systems. Time flows directly into project costs, overhead calculations, and financial reporting.

Project-Centric Design: Unanet organizes everything around projects and contracts. This structure naturally aligns with how government contractors think about their business, making it easier to track costs by contract and generate the reports the DCAA expects.

Configurable Workflows: The system allows you to configure approval workflows, cost allocation rules, and reporting structures to match your specific business practices. This flexibility helps you maintain consistency in your cost accounting methods.

Labor Compliance: Unanet tracks time by project, task, and labor category, with built-in controls to prevent common DCAA violations. The system enforces timesheet submission deadlines and maintains a complete audit trail of all entries and changes.

Best For
Unanet works well for growing contractors in the sweet spot between small businesses and large enterprises:

  • Mid-size government contractors (100-1,000 employees)
  • Architecture, engineering, and consulting firms with project-based work
  • Companies that have outgrown QuickBooks but aren’t ready for Costpoint-level complexity
  • Firms that want business intelligence and dashboards for better decision-making

Considerations

Learning Curve: Unanet is more complex than dedicated timekeeping tools. Plan for several months of training to get your team comfortable with the system.

Cost: Pricing typically ranges from $50,000-$200,000+ depending on modules and user count—more affordable than Costpoint but still a significant investment compared to Hour Timesheet.

Implementation: Most implementations take 3-6 months and require working with Unanet’s implementation team or certified partners. This adds to the total cost and delays the time to value.

Customization Needs: While Unanet offers flexibility, you may need to customize reports and workflows to exactly match your DCAA audit needs. This requires understanding both the software and DCAA requirements.

Why It Ranks #3
Unanet excels for mid-market contractors who need more than timekeeping but aren’t large enough to justify Costpoint. It’s a strong option if you’re growing rapidly and need a system that can scale with you. However, many contractors at this size still find they can meet DCAA requirements more affordably by pairing Hour Timesheet with their existing accounting software rather than replacing everything with a mid-market ERP.


4. QuickBooks Desktop + Hour Timesheet Integration: The Hybrid Approach

What It Is
Many government contractors already use QuickBooks Desktop for their accounting needs. Rather than replacing QuickBooks entirely, they can add Hour Timesheet for DCAA-compliant timekeeping while maintaining their existing accounting workflows. This hybrid approach leverages QuickBooks’ strong accounting features while addressing its critical timekeeping gaps.

Why QuickBooks Time Alone Isn’t Sufficient

QuickBooks offers its own time tracking tool (QuickBooks Time, formerly TSheets), but it falls short of DCAA requirements in several critical ways:

  • Insufficient Audit Trail: QuickBooks Time allows users to edit or delete historical time entries without maintaining adequate documentation of changes. During a DCAA floor check, this lack of a permanent audit trail is a red flag.
  • Limited Approval Controls: The approval process in QuickBooks Time is basic and doesn’t enforce the oversight the DCAA expects. Supervisors can approve time in bulk without reviewing individual entries, and there’s limited documentation of who approved what and when.
  • Weak Labor Distribution: While QuickBooks Time can track time by customer and service item, it doesn’t generate the detailed labor distribution reports the DCAA requires, particularly for contractors with multiple indirect cost pools.
  • Correction Documentation: When time entries need to be corrected, QuickBooks Time doesn’t force users to document the reason for corrections in the detail the DCAA expects.

How Hour Timesheet Fills the Gaps

The Hour Timesheet + QuickBooks Desktop integration creates a DCAA-compliant solution:

Employees Use Hour Timesheet: Team members track their time through Hour Timesheet’s web or mobile interface, which enforces daily entry, prevents backdating beyond policy limits, and creates an immutable audit trail.

Supervisors Approve in Hour Timesheet: All timesheet approvals happen in Hour Timesheet, with documented approval chains and the ability to add comments or request corrections. This oversight meets DCAA expectations.

Data Syncs to QuickBooks: Approved time automatically syncs to QuickBooks Desktop, creating payroll records and job costing entries. The integration is bidirectional—you set up employees, customers, and service items in QuickBooks, and Hour Timesheet pulls that information for time tracking.

Labor Reports from Hour Timesheet: When you need labor distribution reports for DCAA audits, you generate them from Hour Timesheet, which has the granular time data and reporting capability QuickBooks lacks.

Accounting in QuickBooks: You continue using QuickBooks for all your accounting functions—A/P, A/R, financial statements, tax reporting. Nothing changes except that your timekeeping is now DCAA compliant.

Best For
The hybrid approach is ideal for:

  • Small to mid-size contractors already comfortable with QuickBooks Desktop
  • Companies that want to maintain their existing accounting workflows
  • Firms that need DCAA-compliant timekeeping without replacing their entire accounting system
  • Contractors looking to minimize disruption and training overhead

Pricing
You’ll need QuickBooks Desktop (starting around $1,800/year for three users) plus Hour Timesheet ($8-10 per user per month). For a 30-person company, you’re looking at roughly $4,000-5,000 annually—far less than implementing a full ERP while maintaining DCAA compliance.

Why It Ranks #4
This hybrid approach deserves recognition because it solves a real problem: many contractors are deeply invested in QuickBooks and resistant to changing their entire accounting system. By adding Hour Timesheet, they can achieve DCAA compliance without the disruption and expense of replacing QuickBooks. The only reason it ranks behind Hour Timesheet as a standalone is that some contractors prefer not to manage two systems, even when they integrate seamlessly.


5. Jamis Prime: Specialized Government Contractor ERP

What It Is
Jamis Prime is an ERP system focused exclusively on government contractors. Like Deltek, it’s a comprehensive solution covering accounting, project management, contracts management, and business intelligence. Jamis targets the mid-market space, positioning itself as more accessible than Costpoint while offering deeper functionality than basic accounting software.

DCAA Compliance Features

Jamis Prime includes DCAA-focused capabilities:

Integrated Timekeeping: The system includes built-in time entry with approval workflows and audit trails designed to meet DCAA standards. Time integrates directly with project costing and payroll.

Contracts Management: Jamis tracks contract ceiling amounts, funding, modifications, and billing, helping contractors avoid the costly mistake of overrunning contract values.

Compliance Tools: The system includes features specifically for government contractor compliance, including provisional billing rates, contract closeout workflows, and FAR-compliant billing formats.

Project Cost Tracking: Jamis provides granular project accounting, tracking costs by contract, task, and cost type. This level of detail supports both DCAA audits and internal project management.

Best For
Jamis Prime works for specific scenarios:

  • Mid-size contractors (100-500 employees) who want an ERP but find Costpoint too expensive
  • Companies that need contracts management integrated with accounting
  • Firms in specific industries where Jamis has developed specialized functionality
  • Contractors already using Jamis products who want to maintain that relationship

Limitations

Smaller User Base: Jamis has a smaller market share than Deltek or Unanet, which can mean fewer resources for troubleshooting, less community support, and fewer third-party integrations.

Integration Challenges: While Jamis has APIs, contractors often find it harder to integrate with other specialized tools compared to more widely-used platforms.

Cost vs. Alternatives: Jamis pricing is comparable to Unanet but higher than the Hour Timesheet + QuickBooks approach. For many contractors, it’s difficult to justify the added cost when simpler solutions meet their compliance needs.

Implementation: Like other ERPs, Jamis requires significant time and resources to implement properly—typically 3-6 months.

Why It Ranks #5
Jamis Prime is a solid solution for contractors who need its specific functionality and prefer working with a company focused exclusively on government contracting. However, it ranks last on this list because most contractors are better served by either more affordable focused solutions (Hour Timesheet) or more comprehensive enterprise platforms (Deltek) depending on their size and complexity. Jamis occupies an awkward middle ground where the total cost of ownership doesn’t always align with the value delivered for typical government contracting scenarios.


DCAA Compliant Accounting Systems: Quick Comparison

System Best For Approx. Annual Cost Implementation Time Key Strength Main Limitation
Hour Timesheet Small-mid contractors (10-500 employees) $5,000-$50,000 1-2 weeks Purpose-built DCAA compliance, affordable Not a full accounting system
Deltek Costpoint Large contractors (500+ employees) $100,000+ (first year) 6-12 months Comprehensive enterprise functionality Very expensive, complex
Unanet GovCon Mid-market contractors (100-1,000 employees) $50,000-$200,000+ 3-6 months Project-centric design, scalable Learning curve, mid-level cost
QuickBooks + Hour Timesheet Small contractors already using QuickBooks $4,000-$10,000 1-2 weeks Minimal disruption, leverages existing system Requires managing two platforms
Jamis Prime Mid-market contractors needing contracts management $60,000-$150,000+ 3-6 months Contracts management integration Smaller user community

How to Choose the Right DCAA Compliant System

Selecting the right accounting system isn’t about finding the most feature-rich option—it’s about matching the solution to your specific situation. Here’s how to make that decision:

Consider Your Company Size
Small contractors (under 100 employees) rarely need enterprise ERP functionality. You’re better off with focused solutions that deliver DCAA compliance without forcing you to manage modules you’ll never use. As you grow beyond 100-200 employees, evaluate whether you need the project management and business intelligence capabilities that mid-market ERPs provide.

Budget Realistically
Don’t just look at licensing costs. Factor in implementation fees, training time, ongoing maintenance, and the opportunity cost of having your team focused on system implementation rather than winning contracts. For many contractors, spending $100,000 on an ERP implementation means forgoing $100,000 in business development—and that trade-off doesn’t always make sense.

Assess Your Timeline
If you’re facing a DCAA audit in 90 days, you don’t have time for a 6-month ERP implementation. In urgent scenarios, you need a system you can implement quickly. Hour Timesheet and similar focused tools can be up and running in days, allowing you to establish compliant processes before your audit begins.

Evaluate Your Existing Systems
If you’re already using QuickBooks Desktop and your team is comfortable with it, think carefully before ripping it out. The hybrid approach of adding compliant timekeeping to your existing accounting software often delivers better results than forcing your team to learn an entirely new ERP—especially if your accounting needs are relatively straightforward.

Think About Support Needs
Large ERP implementations typically include dedicated account management and support teams, but you pay dearly for that service. Smaller, focused tools may have less hand-holding during implementation but often provide responsive support for the specific problems they solve. Consider which support model fits your team’s technical capabilities.

Plan for Growth
Choose a system that can scale with your business. If you’re a 50-person contractor today but expect to be 200 people in three years, make sure your chosen solution won’t become a bottleneck. That said, don’t pay for enterprise capabilities you won’t need for 5+ years—you can always migrate systems as you grow.


Conclusion: DCAA Compliance Isn’t Optional

Choosing a DCAA compliant accounting system isn’t a luxury or a “nice to have”—it’s essential for survival as a government contractor. The DCAA has become increasingly stringent in its audit approach, and contractors with inadequate accounting systems face real consequences: suspended payments, contract termination, and reputational damage that makes winning future work nearly impossible.

The good news? Achieving DCAA compliance doesn’t require spending six figures on enterprise software. For most small to mid-size contractors, purpose-built solutions like Hour Timesheet deliver the specific compliance capabilities you need at a fraction of the cost and complexity of full ERP systems.

The key is being honest about your actual needs. If you’re a 50-person professional services contractor, you probably don’t need manufacturing cost tracking or complex revenue recognition. You need bulletproof timekeeping, clean labor distribution reports, and an audit trail that can withstand scrutiny. Focus on solving those specific problems rather than buying functionality you’ll never use.

Ready to ensure your accounting system meets DCAA standards? Hour Timesheet offers a free 30-day trial with full access to all DCAA compliance features. See for yourself why government contractors trust Hour Timesheet to protect them during audits while keeping costs reasonable and implementation simple.

Start your free trial today or schedule a personalized demo to discuss your specific DCAA compliance needs.