DCAA Record Retention for Government Contractors

DCAA record retention

Your accounting server crashed during month-end closing, and your IT team spent three days recovering data from the most recent backup. When you finally restored operations, you discovered the backup was incomplete—missing two weeks of timesheet entries and critical job costing transactions supporting $450,000 in government contract billings. DCAA auditors arrived for a scheduled incurred cost audit and couldn’t verify labor charges because your reconstructed timekeeping records lacked the contemporaneous entry dates, electronic signatures, and audit trail documentation required under FAR 52.215-2. Here’s what contractors miss about data backup: DCAA compliance requires more than disaster recovery capability restoring your ability to process payroll and generate financial statements. You need backup systems preserving complete audit trails, supporting documentation, and transaction histories proving costs charged to government contracts throughout retention periods mandated by FAR 4.703. Understanding how to implement backup and recovery systems meeting both operational needs and compliance requirements protects your contract portfolio while ensuring business continuity.

The Legal Framework Backup Systems Must Satisfy

Federal record retention requirements create specific backup and recovery obligations extending beyond general business continuity planning. FAR 4.703 mandates contractors maintain records supporting contract costs for minimum periods including three years after final payment for most contracts, with extended periods for certain cost types and contract situations. Your backup systems must preserve these records through required retention periods regardless of server failures, software migrations, or business disruptions affecting primary systems.

FAR 31.201-2 establishes that allowable costs must be adequately documented, meaning backup recovery must restore complete audit trails, transaction details, and supporting documentation—not just summary financial data. When DCAA auditors request records supporting specific costs, your backup and recovery systems must enable providing complete documentation demonstrating cost accuracy, allocability, and allowability. “We had a server crash and lost the details” doesn’t satisfy regulatory documentation requirements.

The critical consideration involves FAR 52.215-2, the Audit and Records clause requiring contractors to make records available for examination by government auditors. Your backup systems must enable audit access throughout retention periods, meaning recovered data must maintain usability, accessibility, and completeness supporting auditor verification procedures. Archived backup tapes stored offsite satisfy disaster recovery needs but fail compliance requirements if data can’t be accessed efficiently when DCAA arrives for audits.

What Contractors Must Understand About Backup Compliance

Here’s what contractors miss about backup systems: IT departments typically focus on recovery time objectives and recovery point objectives measuring how quickly you restore operations and how much recent data might be lost during failures. These metrics serve business continuity needs but don’t address DCAA’s compliance requirements for complete record preservation, audit trail integrity, and long-term data accessibility. Your backup meeting IT’s 24-hour recovery objective might still leave you unable to support three-year-old costs during incurred cost audits because archived data isn’t readily accessible.

The audit trail preservation challenge creates immediate compliance concerns when backups don’t capture complete transaction histories. Understanding DCAA timekeeping requirements means ensuring backups preserve not just approved timesheet totals but original entries, all corrections with date/time stamps, user identification for changes, and supervisory approval workflows. Standard database backups might capture current data states without maintaining the change history demonstrating compliance with contemporaneous recording requirements and proper authorization procedures.

Supporting documentation integration represents another backup complexity often overlooked. Government contract costs require supporting documentation including vendor invoices, purchase orders, receiving reports, travel receipts, and technical justifications for sole-source procurements. When these supporting documents exist as separate attachments, scanned files, or shared drive documents, your backup procedures must ensure synchronized preservation coordinating financial data with linked documentation. Recovering your accounting database without associated supporting documents leaves you unable to substantiate costs during audits.

DCAA compliance explained for backup systems means implementing comprehensive data preservation including transaction details, audit trails, supporting documentation, system configurations, and user access records—not just core financial tables enabling operational recovery.

The long-term accessibility challenge affects compliance when backup formats, storage media, or software versions become obsolete before retention periods expire. That three-year-old backup on LTO-5 tape using SQL Server 2012 might be technically recoverable but practically inaccessible if you’ve upgraded infrastructure eliminating tape drives and migrated to newer database platforms. Your backup strategy must address technology evolution ensuring archived data remains accessible throughout required retention periods despite inevitable system upgrades.

Five Essential Steps for Compliant Backup and Recovery

Step 1: Implement Comprehensive Multi-Tier Backup Architecture

Deploy backup systems capturing multiple data types including database transactions, document attachments, email correspondence, system configurations, and user access records supporting government contract cost substantiation. Create automated backup schedules running daily for transactional data, weekly for supporting documentation, and monthly for system configurations ensuring comprehensive coverage without excessive storage requirements.

Establish multi-tier backup retention matching regulatory requirements including short-term backups for operational recovery (daily/weekly backups retained 30-90 days), medium-term backups for contract performance period coverage (monthly backups retained through contract completion), and long-term archives for regulatory compliance (annual backups retained minimum three years after contract closeout). Configure automated backup rotation preventing premature deletion of data needed for compliance while managing storage costs for recent backups serving operational needs.

Deploy geographically distributed backup storage including onsite backups for rapid operational recovery, offsite backups protecting against facility disasters, and cloud-based backups providing redundancy and accessibility. Multiple storage locations ensure data availability despite fires, floods, or other catastrophic events affecting primary facilities while enabling audit access from backup locations when primary systems remain unavailable.

Step 2: Establish Audit Trail and Transaction History Preservation

Configure backup procedures capturing complete audit trails including transaction creation dates, user identification for entries, all modifications with change timestamps, approval workflows, and electronic signatures supporting authentication. Implement database logging ensuring backup snapshots preserve change history rather than just current data states, enabling DCAA auditors to verify contemporaneous recording requirements and proper authorization procedures.

Deploy specialized backup capabilities for systems maintaining crucial audit trails including timekeeping platforms, expense reporting tools, and procurement systems where transaction-level detail proves compliance. Standard file-level backups might miss database journal files, application logs, or embedded audit trails requiring application-aware backup procedures ensuring complete preservation. Work with software vendors understanding their applications’ backup requirements for preserving audit trail integrity.

Create systematic testing procedures periodically restoring random backup samples verifying audit trail completeness, transaction detail accuracy, and supporting documentation availability. Testing uncovers backup configuration errors before real disasters require recovery, identifying gaps in audit trail preservation requiring immediate correction.

Step 3: Build Supporting Documentation Backup and Integration Systems

Implement document management systems centralizing supporting documentation with systematic backup procedures ensuring coordinated preservation of financial transactions and linked documents. Configure systems maintaining referential integrity where accounting entries link to specific invoices, receipts, or approvals, with backup procedures preserving these relationships enabling auditors to trace from costs to supporting documentation efficiently.

Deploy metadata preservation ensuring backups capture not just document content but creation dates, author information, modification history, and approval workflows demonstrating document authenticity and proper authorization. This metadata proves documents existed contemporaneously with transactions they support rather than being created retroactively during audit preparation.

Establish procedures for backing up email correspondence and informal documentation supporting business decisions, sole-source justifications, price reasonableness determinations, and management approvals referenced in formal cost accounting records. Email backups require legal hold procedures ensuring messages supporting government contracts aren’t deleted during routine retention policy enforcement.

Step 4: Create Long-Term Archive Management and Technology Migration Procedures

Develop systematic archive management addressing technology evolution throughout multi-year retention periods. Implement data format migration procedures transferring archived backups to current platforms as technology upgrades occur, preventing data obsolescence from abandoned legacy systems. When upgrading from SQL Server 2016 to SQL Server 2022, migrate old backups to new platform formats ensuring continued accessibility without requiring maintaining obsolete infrastructure.

Deploy backup format standards emphasizing open, well-documented formats reducing dependency on specific proprietary software versions. Where possible, supplement native database backups with CSV exports, PDF conversions, or XML data dumps providing long-term accessibility independent of specific software platforms. These human-readable formats ensure data remains accessible even if original applications become unavailable.

Create comprehensive documentation describing backup procedures, data formats, recovery procedures, and archive locations with updates maintained throughout technology changes. This documentation ensures future personnel (or external auditors) can access archived data years after original system administrators have departed. Include vendor contact information, license keys, and technical specifications supporting data recovery from archived formats.

Step 5: Implement Backup Verification, Testing, and Recovery Drills

Establish quarterly backup verification procedures confirming scheduled backups complete successfully, storage systems maintain adequate capacity, and backup retention policies function as configured. Monitor backup logs identifying failures requiring immediate investigation rather than discovering backup problems during actual disaster recovery attempts.

Deploy systematic recovery testing procedures quarterly restoring complete backup sets to isolated test environments verifying data integrity, audit trail completeness, and supporting documentation availability. Recovery drills uncover configuration errors, missing components, or accessibility issues before real disasters require using backups for operations or audit support. Document all testing procedures with formal reports demonstrating systematic backup management to DCAA auditors evaluating your business systems adequacy.

Create disaster recovery plans documenting step-by-step procedures for restoring operations from backups including technical recovery steps, personnel responsibilities, vendor contact information, and business process resumption procedures. Test disaster recovery plans annually through tabletop exercises or actual recovery drills ensuring organizational preparedness for business disruptions. DCAA compliance requirements reward contractors demonstrating systematic business continuity management through documented procedures and regular testing.

The Investment in Compliant Backup Systems

Implementing comprehensive backup and recovery systems meeting DCAA requirements costs between $8,000 and $35,000 for small to mid-sized contractors depending on data volumes, system complexity, and storage requirements. This includes backup software licensing, offsite storage subscriptions, cloud backup services, initial configuration, and staff training. Annual maintenance costs typically run $2,400 to $8,400 for ongoing storage, software updates, and testing procedures.

Let me show you the value: contractors with robust backup systems recover quickly from hardware failures, ransomware attacks, or natural disasters minimizing business disruption and revenue loss. They demonstrate professionalism to DCAA auditors through systematic record preservation and efficient audit support. They satisfy insurance requirements and customer expectations for business continuity preparedness supporting competitive positioning.

Contractors with inadequate backup systems face catastrophic exposure from data loss requiring expensive forensic recovery attempts often costing $50,000-$150,000 with uncertain success rates. They experience extended business disruptions preventing contract performance and billing while rebuilding lost records. They face DCAA questioned costs when unable to substantiate charges because supporting records can’t be recovered, potentially affecting millions in contract billings.

Understanding Backup Requirements Across Federal Agencies

FAR record retention requirements apply uniformly across all federal agencies and contract types creating consistent backup obligations regardless of whether you support Department of Defense, NASA, Department of Energy, or civilian agency contracts. The three-year minimum retention period in FAR 4.703 establishes baseline requirements applicable nationwide, though some contract types or agencies impose extended periods requiring longer backup retention.

Cost-reimbursement contracts face enhanced scrutiny regarding record preservation because government relies on contractor records supporting cost claims. Fixed-price contracts require identical backup and retention capabilities when prices were based on cost or pricing data or when equitable adjustment claims require substantiating actual costs. Your backup systems must serve all contract types through comprehensive preservation approaches.

Your Path to Business Continuity and Compliance

The backup and recovery landscape rewards contractors who invest in comprehensive systems addressing both operational continuity and regulatory compliance rather than treating backup as purely IT infrastructure concern. DCAA evaluates business system adequacy including disaster recovery preparedness during accounting system audits, viewing backup capabilities as indicators of management sophistication and business practice quality.

For contractors seeking backup solutions combining operational efficiency with compliance requirements, Hour Timesheet provides cloud-based infrastructure with automated backup, geographically distributed storage, and comprehensive audit trail preservation. Our platform ensures your timekeeping data—including transaction details, electronic signatures, and approval workflows—remains protected and accessible throughout required retention periods without requiring separate backup management.

Your backup systems represent insurance protecting both operational continuity and regulatory compliance. Invest in comprehensive solutions providing dual protection rather than minimum recovery capabilities leaving compliance gaps.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

Cloud-Based Accounting Systems: DCAA Security and Access Requirements

DCAA cloud security requirements

Your company migrated to cloud-based accounting to reduce IT infrastructure costs, enable remote work flexibility, and access your financial data from anywhere. Then DCAA auditors requested system access for their incurred cost audit and raised questions about data security controls, user access management, and whether your cloud provider’s terms of service actually permit government auditor access to records supporting federal contract costs. Here’s what contractors miss about cloud accounting and DCAA compliance: cloud platforms provide excellent operational capabilities and cost efficiency, but government contract requirements under FAR 52.215-2 mandate specific audit access rights, data security controls, and record preservation capabilities that standard commercial cloud subscriptions don’t automatically address. Understanding how to configure cloud systems for DCAA compliance—and what to negotiate with cloud providers—protects both your technology investment and your contract portfolio while leveraging modern infrastructure.

The Legal Framework Cloud Systems Must Satisfy

DCAA audit access requirements stem from Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses embedded in solicitations and contracts granting government auditors specific rights to examine contractor records. FAR 52.215-2, the Audit and Records clause, requires contractors to maintain and make available records supporting costs charged to government contracts, with access rights extending until three years after final payment. This isn’t optional access contingent on contractor convenience—it’s a legal obligation creating contractor responsibility to provide timely, complete audit access regardless of record storage location or format.

FAR 31.201-2 establishes that allowable costs must be adequately documented, meaning your cloud-based records must provide the same audit trail depth, transaction detail, and supporting documentation as traditional on-premise systems. The regulation doesn’t distinguish between cloud and local storage—it mandates adequate records supporting cost determinations. Your cloud migration can’t reduce documentation quality or auditor access compared to previous systems.

The critical consideration for cloud contractors involves FAR 4.703, governing file retention requirements mandating contractors preserve records for specified periods including three years after final payment for most contracts. Cloud systems must ensure data retention through contract closeout periods regardless of subscription status, platform changes, or business relationship modifications with cloud providers. When your QuickBooks Online subscription expires, you still need records supporting closed government contracts—and “I don’t have access anymore” doesn’t satisfy FAR retention obligations.

What Contractors Must Understand About Cloud Compliance Challenges

Here’s what contractors miss about cloud-based accounting: commercial cloud platforms prioritize ease of use, mobility, and subscription revenue over government contractor compliance requirements that represent niche market needs. Your cloud provider optimizes for millions of small businesses needing basic accounting, not thousands of government contractors requiring DCAA audit accommodation. Standard terms of service rarely address auditor access rights, data preservation obligations, or security controls specific to federal contract cost accounting.

The audit access challenge creates immediate compliance concerns when DCAA requests system access for electronic audit procedures. Auditors increasingly use data analytics requiring direct system access rather than reviewing exported reports or printed documents. Your cloud provider might prohibit sharing login credentials with third parties (including government auditors), lack functionality for creating auditor-specific user accounts, or impose additional fees for audit access creating financial barriers to compliance. Understanding DCAA compliance requirements means ensuring your cloud platform supports auditor access before DCAA arrives requesting system entry.

Data security and segregation presents another cloud compliance complexity. Government contracts often require protecting controlled unclassified information, proprietary technical data, or cost and pricing information from unauthorized disclosure. Your cloud accounting system contains sensitive contract pricing, indirect rate calculations, and employee compensation data requiring protection. Multi-tenant cloud architectures where your data shares infrastructure with other subscribers create security considerations different from dedicated on-premise servers under your complete control.

The data export and portability challenge affects long-term compliance when you need historical records after changing cloud providers or when subscriptions lapse. DCAA compliance explained requires maintaining complete records for minimum three years after contract completion—potentially 5-7 years from original data entry depending on contract closeout timing. Your cloud system must enable exporting complete datasets including transaction details, supporting documentation, and audit trail histories in formats preserving usability for future audit access.

User access controls and audit trail capabilities separate compliant cloud systems from basic platforms serving commercial businesses. Government contract accounting demands detailed audit trails showing who entered transactions, when entries occurred, what modifications happened, and management approval workflows supporting cost accuracy. Generic cloud accounting providing simplified bookkeeping might lack the granular audit trail detail DCAA expects during compliance verification.

Five Essential Steps for Cloud Accounting Compliance

Step 1: Verify and Document DCAA Audit Access Provisions

Review your cloud platform’s terms of service and user agreements identifying provisions affecting government auditor access to your records. Contact your cloud provider confirming they permit creating temporary auditor user accounts, allow government personnel system access, and won’t impose excessive fees or delays when DCAA requests audit access. Document these access provisions in writing including screenshots of relevant terms, email confirmations from provider support, and any negotiated modifications addressing government audit requirements.

Request specific audit access features from your cloud provider including ability to create read-only user accounts for auditors, configure access periods matching audit timelines, and generate comprehensive audit logs showing all system activity during audit periods. Some cloud platforms offer government contractor-specific tiers or compliance packages addressing DCAA access needs—investigate whether your provider offers enhanced versions supporting compliance requirements.

Establish documented procedures for providing DCAA auditors with system access including user account creation processes, access credential delivery methods, and support contacts assisting auditors navigating your cloud platform. Test these procedures annually through mock audits confirming system access works as documented before real DCAA audits arrive.

Step 2: Implement Comprehensive Data Security and Access Controls

Configure your cloud accounting with role-based access controls limiting user permissions to minimum necessary for job functions. Deploy multi-factor authentication for all users adding security layers beyond simple passwords protecting sensitive contract cost data from unauthorized access. Enable detailed activity logging capturing all user actions including data access, transaction entry, report generation, and configuration changes supporting security verification.

Establish data classification procedures identifying information requiring enhanced protection including contract pricing, indirect rate calculations, employee compensation details, and proprietary technical data embedded in project descriptions or cost accounts. Implement additional security controls for classified data categories including encryption for data at rest and in transit, restricted user access, and monitoring for unusual access patterns suggesting potential security incidents.

Deploy regular security assessments including user access reviews confirming current permissions remain appropriate, activity log analysis identifying anomalous behavior, and vulnerability scanning ensuring your cloud platform maintains current security patches. Document these security procedures demonstrating systematic protection of government contract information satisfying reasonable business practice standards.

Step 3: Create Comprehensive Data Backup and Retention Systems

Implement automated backup procedures capturing complete accounting data including transaction details, supporting attachments, user information, and system configurations on at least weekly basis. Store backups separately from primary cloud platform—either through provider’s backup services or third-party backup solutions—ensuring data availability if primary platform experiences outages, service terminations, or data loss incidents.

Develop documented data retention policies establishing preservation periods for different record types based on FAR requirements, contract closeout timing, and applicable statute of limitations periods. Configure your cloud system’s retention settings preventing automatic deletion of historical data needed for regulatory compliance. Create procedures for archiving old data when approaching cloud storage limits without losing access required for audit or legal purposes.

Establish data portability procedures enabling complete dataset export in standard formats (CSV, PDF, database dumps) preserving full functionality and audit trail integrity. Test export procedures annually confirming your ability to retrieve complete historical records in usable formats without cloud provider assistance—eliminating dependency on continued platform access for compliance obligations.

Step 4: Build Integration Between Cloud Accounting and Specialized Compliance Systems

Recognize that general-purpose cloud accounting platforms excel at bookkeeping but often lack specific government contractor capabilities including DCAA-compliant timekeeping, job costing granularity, or unallowable cost segregation. Deploy specialized solutions like Hour Timesheet for compliant timekeeping integrating with your cloud accounting through APIs or data feeds ensuring labor cost accuracy while maintaining audit trail integrity.

Configure integration architecture ensuring data flows seamlessly between specialized compliance systems and cloud accounting without manual intervention or data transformation steps introducing errors. Implement reconciliation procedures comparing specialized system totals to cloud accounting accumulation verifying integration accuracy and identifying interface failures requiring immediate correction.

Establish change management procedures governing updates to either cloud accounting platforms or integrated compliance systems, testing changes in sandbox environments before production deployment ensuring updates don’t disrupt integration or introduce compliance gaps. Document all integration architecture including data flow diagrams, interface specifications, and testing procedures supporting audit verification.

Step 5: Develop Cloud Provider Relationship and Contingency Planning

Create formal communication channels with cloud provider support teams including dedicated contacts for compliance questions, service level agreements addressing audit support needs, and escalation procedures ensuring priority handling of government audit access requests. Document your provider relationship strength through service agreements, support responsiveness records, and provider compliance certifications demonstrating their understanding of government contractor requirements.

Develop contingency plans addressing potential cloud provider service disruptions, business failures, or relationship terminations ensuring continued access to historical records required for compliance. Maintain current data backups sufficient to reconstruct accounting records through alternative platforms if forced to migrate unexpectedly. Establish relationships with alternative cloud providers enabling rapid migration if current provider proves inadequate for government compliance needs.

Implement annual provider assessments evaluating whether your cloud platform continues meeting compliance requirements as your business grows, contract portfolio expands, or government regulations evolve. Be prepared to migrate to more capable platforms when business needs exceed current cloud system capabilities—vendor lock-in concerns shouldn’t prevent addressing compliance inadequacies.

The Investment in Cloud Compliance Configuration

Configuring cloud-based accounting for DCAA compliance costs between $5,000 and $25,000 for small to mid-sized contractors depending on platform selection, integration requirements, and security enhancement needs. This includes initial setup, user training, integration with specialized compliance tools, security configuration, and backup system implementation. Most costs represent one-time configuration rather than ongoing expenses, though annual backup storage and security monitoring may add $1,200 to $3,600 in recurring costs.

Let me show you the value: contractors using properly configured cloud accounting systems access financial data from anywhere enabling remote work and distributed operations, reduce IT infrastructure costs eliminating server maintenance and software updates, and scale systems efficiently as business grows without major platform replacements. Cloud platforms provide operational advantages justifying investment when properly configured for compliance.

Contractors with inadequate cloud configurations face audit delays while reconstructing records from incomplete exports, questioned costs when audit trail deficiencies prevent cost verification, and potential data loss if provider relationships terminate before completing required retention periods. These compliance failures offset any cost savings from cheap cloud subscriptions lacking adequate capabilities.

Understanding Cloud Compliance Across Federal Agencies

DCAA audit access requirements and FAR record retention obligations apply uniformly across all federal agencies and contract types. Your cloud accounting must satisfy identical compliance standards whether supporting Department of Defense contracts, NASA programs, Department of Energy agreements, or civilian agency work. The audit and records clause in FAR 52.215-2 creates consistent national requirements eliminating agency-specific variations in cloud system expectations.

Fixed-price and cost-reimbursement contracts impose identical record retention and audit access obligations despite different cost accounting requirements. Your cloud platform must serve all contract types in your portfolio through comprehensive record-keeping supporting cost verification regardless of contract pricing structure.

Your Path to Cloud Accounting Success

The cloud accounting landscape rewards contractors who invest in proper platform selection and configuration rather than choosing cheapest subscriptions without government compliance consideration. DCAA evaluates record adequacy and audit access capability, not technology sophistication—your cloud system must deliver compliance regardless of operational elegance or mobile app features.

For contractors seeking cloud-based compliance tools combining modern technology with government requirements, Hour Timesheet provides purpose-built solutions designed specifically for federal contractor needs. Our cloud platform delivers DCAA-compliant timekeeping with comprehensive audit trails, secure data storage, and auditor access capabilities while integrating with major cloud accounting platforms including QuickBooks Online, Xero, and NetSuite.

Your cloud migration strategy should leverage modern technology advantages while ensuring compliance capabilities protecting your contract portfolio. Choose platforms and providers understanding government contractor requirements, not just general small business accounting needs.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

Government Contractor Time Tracking Systems Best Practices

Government contractor time tracking systems

Your company modernized operations by implementing electronic timekeeping, eliminating paper timesheets and streamlining payroll processing. Employees swipe badges, managers approve time electronically, and your payroll integrates seamlessly with your accounting system. Then DCAA auditors questioned whether your electronic system actually meets government contract timekeeping requirements under FAR 31.201-4 and discovered your clock-in system tracks attendance but doesn’t capture the job costing detail, daily entry certification, or audit trail documentation proving labor charges to government contracts reflect actual work performed. Here’s what contractors miss about electronic timekeeping: modern technology provides efficiency and accuracy for payroll, but DCAA compliance requires specific capabilities proving time charged to government contracts is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Understanding how to configure electronic timekeeping for government compliance—or when to supplement attendance systems with purpose-built solutions—protects your contract portfolio while leveraging technology investments.

The Legal Framework Electronic Timekeeping Must Satisfy

DCAA timekeeping requirements stem from Federal Acquisition Regulation cost principles establishing that labor costs must be supported by adequate documentation. FAR 31.201-2 mandates reasonable costs, meaning labor charges must reflect actual time employees spent on contracts, not estimates, averages, or statistical distributions. FAR 52.232-7, the Payments under Time-and-Materials and Labor-Hour Contracts clause, creates specific requirements that contractors maintain and make available time records supporting labor charges—requirements enforced through DCAA audit procedures detailed in Contract Audit Manual Chapter 5.

The DCAA standard for timekeeping adequacy requires systems capturing six essential elements: daily time entry showing hours worked each day, charging to specific contracts or cost objectives reflecting actual work performed, employee certification attesting to time accuracy, supervisory approval confirming work performance, contemporaneous recording prohibiting after-the-fact reconstruction, and complete audit trails showing any corrections or changes. Electronic systems must deliver all six elements, not just convenient clock-in/clock-out functionality serving payroll needs.

Cost Accounting Standard 418, governing allocation of direct and indirect costs, reinforces timekeeping requirements by mandating that labor cost allocation must be based on actual causal relationships between work performed and contracts benefiting from that work. Your timekeeping system must capture information supporting cost allocation decisions—which means tracking work activities, not just attendance hours. When employees work on multiple contracts during a day, your system must record the specific distribution of time across those contracts, not apply allocation percentages after the fact.

What Contractors Must Understand About Electronic System Capabilities

Here’s what contractors miss about electronic timekeeping: badge swipe systems, biometric attendance tracking, and mobile clock-in apps excel at capturing when employees arrive and depart, but they rarely capture what work employees performed or which contracts benefited from their time. Your attendance system prevents time theft and ensures accurate payroll hours, but DCAA needs job costing information proving labor charges to government contracts reflect actual project work, not convenient cost allocation assumptions.

The daily time entry requirement creates the first major compliance gap in basic electronic systems. Many attendance platforms record weekly totals or allow batch time entry at week-end, violating DCAA’s mandate for daily contemporaneous recording. Understanding DCAA timekeeping requirements means implementing systems requiring employees to record time daily with system-enforced controls preventing submission delays. The requirement isn’t arbitrary—daily entry ensures accuracy by capturing information while fresh in employees’ minds, reducing errors from weekly reconstruction attempting to remember Monday’s activities on Friday afternoon.

Contract-level detail represents another critical capability gap. Your attendance system might track department, cost center, or general project codes serving internal cost accounting needs, but DCAA requires charging to specific government contracts with sufficient detail to support cost accumulation by contract line item, task order, or work package when your contracts require that granularity. Generic codes like “Government Work” or “Defense Projects” don’t satisfy compliance requirements when you’re performing multiple simultaneous contracts requiring separate cost tracking.

The certification and approval workflow separates compliant electronic systems from simple attendance tracking. DCAA requires employee certification—an affirmative statement that recorded time is accurate and represents actual work performed—plus supervisory approval confirming the employee actually performed the certified work. Electronic signatures satisfy these requirements when properly implemented with audit trails showing who certified, when certification occurred, and preserving original certified records. Badge swipes don’t constitute certification, and manager approval of payroll hours differs from supervisory certification of contract work performance.

DCAA compliance explained for electronic timekeeping means understanding these systems must deliver complete audit trails demonstrating compliance, not just efficient payroll processing.

Five Essential Steps for Electronic Timekeeping Compliance

Step 1: Implement Daily Time Entry with Mandatory Submission Controls

Configure your electronic timekeeping system requiring employees to record time daily with system-enforced submission deadlines preventing delayed entry. Deploy automated reminders notifying employees of unsubmitted timesheets before end of each workday, escalating to management alerts when employees approach deadline violations. Build system controls preventing payroll processing for employees with incomplete timesheet submissions, creating operational incentives ensuring compliance.

Design user interfaces making daily time entry simple and intuitive—compliance fails when systems create unnecessary complexity discouraging daily submission. Mobile-responsive platforms enabling employees to submit time from any device eliminate “I was away from my desk” excuses preventing daily entry. The goal is making daily compliance easier than delayed reconstruction.

Establish exception procedures for legitimate situations requiring retroactive time entry—travel, illness, system outages—with mandatory management approval and documented business justification for each exception. Track exception frequency by employee identifying individuals requiring additional training or supervision ensuring consistent daily entry compliance.

Step 2: Deploy Contract-Level Job Costing with Activity Detail

Build electronic timekeeping with hierarchical charging structures enabling employees to record time to specific contracts, then task orders or contract line items, then work activities or labor categories as your contracts require. Create dropdown menus or search functions helping employees quickly locate correct charge codes without memorizing complex numbering systems. Validate charge code availability preventing employees from charging to closed contracts or unauthorized accounts.

Implement favorite or frequently-used contract lists enabling employees to access their primary charge codes quickly while maintaining ability to search full contract listings for occasional charges. Balance ease of use with system controls ensuring proper cost accumulation supporting contract requirements and DCAA audit procedures.

Deploy activity code capabilities when your contracts require distinguishing between engineering, manufacturing, testing, or other work activities within single contracts. This detail supports earned value management, technical performance assessment, and cost allocation verification during audits demonstrating labor charges align with contract deliverables and technical progress.

Step 3: Create Electronic Certification and Approval Workflows

Implement electronic signature capabilities meeting legal standards for binding attestations including user authentication, tamper-evident record preservation, and audit trail maintenance showing certification dates and any subsequent modifications. Build certification language into timesheet submission workflows requiring employees to affirmatively acknowledge accuracy before system acceptance—passive submission without certification doesn’t satisfy DCAA requirements.

Deploy supervisory approval workflows routing submitted timesheets to appropriate managers based on organizational structure, project assignments, or contract requirements. Create approval dashboards showing managers pending timesheets requiring review with aging indicators highlighting items approaching deadline for timely approval. Build escalation procedures routing unprocessed approvals to higher management preventing approval bottlenecks delaying payroll or contract billing.

Establish periodic recertification requirements for previously approved timesheets when significant changes occur—contract modifications, rate adjustments, or error corrections—requiring fresh management review and approval confirming continued accuracy after modifications. Maintain complete audit trails showing original submissions, all modifications, and resulting approvals demonstrating system integrity.

Step 4: Establish Comprehensive Audit Trail and Change Documentation

Configure electronic systems maintaining complete transaction histories capturing original time entries, all modifications with date/time stamps, user identification for every action, and business justification for changes requiring approval. Build system architecture preventing unauthorized deletion or modification of historical records ensuring audit trail integrity for required retention periods extending minimum three years after final contract payment.

Implement change control procedures requiring documented justification for timesheet corrections with approval workflows scaled to correction significance—small clerical errors might require supervisor approval while material changes affecting contract charges require management review and documented business rationale. Create correction reports monitoring frequency and patterns identifying potential compliance issues or training needs.

Deploy automated backup systems ensuring audit trail data protection through redundant storage, disaster recovery procedures, and retrieval capabilities enabling DCAA auditors to access historical records efficiently without requiring manual reconstruction or supplemental documentation development.

Step 5: Build Integration Between Timekeeping and Job Costing Systems

Create seamless integration feeding approved timesheet data directly into project accounting and job costing systems without manual intervention, allocation formulas, or statistical distribution. When employees record 8 hours to Contract A, your job costing must charge exactly 8 hours of that employee’s labor rate to Contract A—zero tolerance for disconnects between timekeeping and cost accounting.

Implement reconciliation procedures comparing timesheet system totals to job costing labor accumulation by employee, project, and accounting period. Investigate any variances immediately requiring root cause analysis and corrective action before variances accumulate into systematic problems discovered during DCAA audits. Monthly reconciliation demonstrates system integration integrity while identifying interface failures requiring immediate correction.

Establish validation controls preventing cost accounting system acceptance of labor charges lacking proper timesheet support—no manual labor entries, no allocation percentages, no after-the-fact distributions circumventing timekeeping records. These controls enforce fundamental requirement that labor costs charged to government contracts must flow from approved timesheet documentation.

The Investment in Compliant Electronic Timekeeping

Implementing DCAA-compliant electronic timekeeping systems costs between $15,000 and $45,000 for small to mid-sized contractors depending on user count, integration requirements, and existing technology infrastructure. Purpose-built solutions like Hour Timesheet deliver required capabilities at price points accessible for small businesses while enterprise implementations requiring custom ERP integration may reach higher investment levels. Annual subscription costs typically range $3,000 to $12,000 based on user licensing and support services.

Let me show you the value: contractors with compliant electronic timekeeping systems process payroll more efficiently, reduce administrative burden on employees and managers, generate reliable job costing data supporting project management decisions, and demonstrate professionalism to DCAA auditors through systematic compliance rather than scrambling to reconstruct documentation during audits. Your timekeeping investment supports both operational efficiency and regulatory compliance—dual value justifying the expenditure.

Contractors with inadequate electronic systems face audit findings requiring costly manual timesheet reconstruction, questioned costs when labor charges can’t be supported by adequate documentation, and competitive disadvantages when accounting system deficiencies appear in past performance evaluations affecting source selection. The cost of inadequate timekeeping extends beyond immediate audit impacts to affect future contract opportunities through damaged reputation with government customers.

Understanding Timekeeping Requirements Across Federal Agencies

DCAA timekeeping standards apply uniformly across all federal agencies and contract types. Your electronic system must satisfy identical requirements whether supporting Department of Defense contracts, NASA programs, Department of Energy work, or civilian agency agreements. The six essential elements—daily entry, contract detail, certification, approval, contemporaneous recording, and audit trails—create national compliance standards eliminating agency-specific variations.

Fixed-price contracts require the same timekeeping rigor as cost-reimbursement contracts when fixed prices were established using cost or pricing data or when contract modifications require equitable adjustment calculations based on actual costs incurred. Time-and-materials contracts face enhanced scrutiny because labor hours directly drive contract payments. Your electronic timekeeping must serve all contract types in your portfolio through consistent compliance approach.

Your Path to Electronic Timekeeping Success

The electronic timekeeping landscape rewards contractors who implement purpose-built solutions designed specifically for government contractor compliance rather than adapting commercial attendance systems serving different business needs. DCAA auditors evaluate system capabilities against regulatory requirements, not technology sophistication—your $100,000 attendance platform receives identical scrutiny as contractors using $10,000 specialized government contractor systems.

For contractors seeking electronic timekeeping combining operational efficiency with DCAA compliance, Hour Timesheet provides purpose-built solutions delivering all six essential elements auditors require. Our platform enforces daily time entry, captures contract-level detail with activity tracking, implements certification and approval workflows, maintains comprehensive audit trails, and integrates seamlessly with major accounting systems feeding approved time directly into job costing.

Your timekeeping system represents the foundation of government contract cost accounting. Build that foundation on compliant technology serving both operational needs and regulatory requirements.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

International Contract Compliance: What You Must Know

Your international expansion strategy looked perfect on paper—establish a lower-cost engineering center in Eastern Europe, leverage manufacturing expertise in Southeast Asia, and tap research talent in your Canadian subsidiary. Then DCAA auditors arrived requesting access to your foreign subsidiary records, demanding timekeeping documentation from your overseas employees, and questioning cost allocations involving international affiliate transactions. Here’s what contractors miss about international operations: DCAA’s audit authority and FAR cost principles don’t stop at U.S. borders. When you charge costs from international operations to U.S. government contracts, those costs must satisfy identical compliance requirements as domestic operations—regardless of foreign subsidiary locations, local business practices, or international accounting standards. Understanding how to maintain DCAA compliance across international operations isn’t optional for global contractors—it’s essential for protecting your entire federal contract portfolio.

The Legal Framework Extending Compliance Internationally

Federal cost accounting requirements apply to all costs charged to U.S. government contracts regardless of where those costs originate geographically. FAR 31.201-2 establishes that allowable costs must be reasonable, meaning they reflect what a prudent businessperson would incur under comparable circumstances. This reasonableness standard applies equally to costs incurred in California and costs incurred in Bangalore—your business justification for international cost structures must satisfy identical scrutiny DCAA applies to domestic operations.

FAR 52.215-2, the Audit and Records clause included in solicitations and contracts, grants DCAA access to “books, documents, papers, and records” supporting costs charged to government contracts. This access right extends to records maintained by subcontractors, affiliates, and subsidiaries when those entities generate costs flowing to government contracts. Your foreign subsidiary’s timekeeping records, payroll documentation, and cost allocation methodologies fall within DCAA’s audit scope when your prime contract includes costs from international operations.

The critical regulation international contractors must understand is FAR 31.205-26, governing material and services costs including requirements for intercompany transactions. When you purchase services from your foreign subsidiary or acquire materials through international affiliates, these related party transactions must demonstrate arm’s-length pricing equivalent to what you’d pay unrelated vendors for comparable items or services. The regulation creates specific documentation requirements proving international affiliate costs charged to government contracts reflect market-based pricing rather than convenient cost allocation schemes.

What International Contractors Must Navigate

Here’s what contractors miss about international compliance: foreign subsidiaries operating under local accounting standards, labor laws, and business practices still must generate records satisfying U.S. government cost accounting requirements when their costs support federal contracts. Your Polish engineering center might follow Polish labor regulations and EU accounting directives, but when Polish engineers charge time to U.S. Defense contracts, their timekeeping must satisfy DCAA standards including daily entry, employee signature, supervisory approval, and prohibition of after-the-fact reconstruction.

The timekeeping challenge gets complicated by time zones, language barriers, and cultural differences in work hour documentation. Many countries use monthly timesheets, flexible work hour systems, or trust-based time reporting completely incompatible with DCAA requirements for contemporaneous daily time entry. Understanding DCAA timekeeping requirements means implementing systems ensuring international employees follow identical timekeeping standards as domestic employees—regardless of local business norms or foreign labor regulations.

Transfer pricing creates the most complex compliance challenge for international operations. When you charge U.S. government contracts for services performed by foreign subsidiaries, DCAA examines whether your intercompany billing rates reflect arm’s-length pricing. If your German subsidiary charges $150 per hour for engineering services your U.S. operation performs at $120 per hour, you need detailed justification explaining the pricing differential through skill level differences, specialized expertise, or market rate variations. Without proper documentation, DCAA presumes the lower domestic rate represents reasonable pricing, disallowing the $30 per hour premium on foreign subsidiary labor.

Material costs sourced internationally face particular scrutiny regarding price reasonableness and proper customs valuation. When you import components from overseas suppliers—especially when those suppliers are affiliated entities—your cost accounting must demonstrate competitive pricing through market research, alternative supplier quotations, or independent cost analysis. The fact that your Chinese manufacturing affiliate is the only source for certain components doesn’t eliminate your obligation to prove pricing reasonableness through benchmarking against comparable items or detailed cost buildup analysis.

DCAA compliance explained for international operations means building documentation systems that bridge U.S. regulatory requirements and foreign operational realities, creating compliant cost accounting while respecting local legal constraints and business practices.

Five Essential Steps for International Contract Compliance

Step 1: Implement Global Timekeeping Standard Operating Procedures

Deploy uniform timekeeping systems and procedures across all locations performing work on U.S. government contracts—domestic and international. Your timekeeping policies must establish identical requirements for time entry frequency, approval workflows, and record retention regardless of employee location. Create detailed guidance translated into local languages explaining DCAA timekeeping requirements and why these standards supersede local business practices when employees work on federal contracts.

Implement DCAA-compliant timekeeping systems with cloud-based access enabling international employees to submit daily time entries with real-time synchronization to your central cost accounting systems. Technology eliminates geography as an excuse for compliance failures—your Polish engineers can submit daily timesheets as easily as your Virginia engineers when you provide proper systems and training.

Establish monthly compliance audits reviewing international employee timekeeping for DCAA requirement adherence including daily entry verification, signature completeness, and supervisory approval documentation. Early identification of compliance gaps enables corrective training before DCAA auditors discover systematic violations affecting multiple accounting periods.

Step 2: Create Comprehensive Transfer Pricing Documentation Systems

Develop detailed transfer pricing policies establishing methodologies for all intercompany transactions between U.S. prime contractors and international subsidiaries or affiliates. Your policies must define pricing bases (cost-plus, market-based, comparable uncontrolled price), document markup percentages with supporting market analysis, and establish approval procedures for intercompany billing rate changes.

Maintain comprehensive comparability studies demonstrating your intercompany pricing reflects arm’s-length transactions through analysis of independent vendor prices, published labor rate surveys, or detailed cost buildup justifications. When your Singapore subsidiary charges engineering services to U.S. contracts, you need documentation proving those rates approximate what you’d pay unaffiliated Singapore engineering firms for comparable services.

Build automated systems flagging intercompany transactions for management review before costs flow to government contracts, ensuring transfer pricing complies with documented methodologies and current market benchmarks. Prevention through systematic controls beats retrospective justification when DCAA challenges international affiliate charges.

Step 3: Establish International Records Access Protocols

Create formal agreements with foreign subsidiaries and affiliates granting DCAA audit access to records supporting costs charged to U.S. government contracts. These access agreements must address potential conflicts with foreign privacy laws, data protection regulations, and local legal restrictions on information disclosure while ensuring DCAA receives documentation necessary for cost verification.

Develop procedures for providing DCAA auditors with international records including translation services for non-English documentation, currency conversion methodologies for financial records, and explanatory context for foreign business practices affecting cost accounting. Proactive transparency builds auditor confidence in your international cost controls while satisfying regulatory access requirements.

Implement secure data sharing systems enabling DCAA auditors to review international subsidiary records without requiring physical travel to foreign locations. Cloud-based document repositories with controlled access streamline audit processes while maintaining appropriate confidentiality and security controls over sensitive business information.

Step 4: Deploy Foreign Exchange and Currency Conversion Controls

Establish systematic procedures for converting foreign currency costs to U.S. dollars using consistent methodologies compliant with GAAP and DCAA requirements. Your currency conversion policies must define exchange rate sources (Federal Reserve, OANDA, specific bank rates), timing of conversion (transaction date, month-end, contract-specific rates), and documentation supporting rate application.

Build accounting system controls automatically applying approved exchange rates to international subsidiary costs as transactions flow to U.S. prime contract cost pools, eliminating manual conversion errors and ensuring consistent methodology application. Create comprehensive audit trails documenting exchange rates used, conversion dates, and resulting U.S. dollar amounts supporting DCAA verification procedures.

Implement hedge accounting procedures when you use forward contracts or other instruments managing foreign exchange risk on international contracts. Hedge costs must be properly allocated to benefiting contracts through systematic methodologies demonstrating reasonable business practices and appropriate cost allocation principles.

Step 5: Create International Compliance Training and Certification Programs

Develop comprehensive training programs educating international employees about U.S. government contract requirements including timekeeping standards, cost allowability principles, and documentation obligations. Training must address cultural and business practice differences explaining why DCAA requirements supersede local norms when work supports federal contracts.

Establish annual certification requirements for international managers overseeing government contract work, confirming understanding of compliance obligations and commitment to maintaining required standards. Management certifications create accountability while demonstrating organizational commitment to international compliance.

Deploy ongoing compliance monitoring through quarterly reviews of international operations including timekeeping audits, transfer pricing verification, and documentation adequacy assessments. Systematic monitoring identifies compliance drift before violations accumulate into major audit findings requiring extensive corrective action.

The Investment in International Compliance Systems

Building robust international contract compliance systems costs between $125,000 and $275,000 for contractors with significant international operations depending on number of foreign locations, complexity of intercompany transactions, and existing system capabilities. This includes implementing global timekeeping systems, developing transfer pricing documentation, creating audit access protocols, and establishing compliance training programs. Annual maintenance typically runs $45,000 to $85,000 for ongoing monitoring and system updates.

Let me show you the value: contractors with excellent international compliance systems compete successfully for global programs requiring multinational performance, leverage international talent and cost advantages while maintaining government contract eligibility, and expand into commercial international markets using infrastructure built for government compliance. Your investment in international compliance systems creates competitive capabilities beyond regulatory requirement satisfaction.

Contractors without adequate systems face questioned costs on international subsidiary charges requiring contract price reductions, billing holds while you reconstruct transfer pricing justifications delaying cash flow for months, and competitive disadvantages in source selection when past performance evaluations note international compliance weaknesses. These consequences affect your entire contract portfolio—not just specific international programs.

Understanding DCAA’s Global Audit Jurisdiction

DCAA audit authority extends to all costs charged to U.S. government contracts regardless of where those costs originate globally. The agency maintains regional offices worldwide and coordinates with Defense Contract Management Agency International for audit support in countries with significant U.S. contractor presence. Your Munich subsidiary and your Manila operations face identical DCAA scrutiny as your Memphis headquarters when their costs support federal contracts.

Multi-national contractors must recognize that compliance requirements don’t vary by location—FAR cost principles, CAS requirements, and DCAA audit standards apply uniformly worldwide. You cannot claim local business practices justify non-compliance with U.S. government cost accounting requirements. The burden falls on contractors to implement systems ensuring international operations satisfy U.S. regulatory requirements regardless of conflicts with local norms.

Your Path to Global Contract Success

The international contract compliance landscape rewards contractors who build robust systems enabling global operations while maintaining regulatory compliance. DCAA respects contractors demonstrating systematic international compliance management through uniform policies, comprehensive documentation, and proactive audit cooperation across all geographic locations.

For contractors managing international operations supporting U.S. government contracts, Hour Timesheet provides cloud-based solutions enabling consistent DCAA-compliant timekeeping across global workforces. Our platform delivers the daily time entry, approval workflows, and audit trail capabilities international employees need while maintaining centralized compliance monitoring for management oversight.

Your international operations represent competitive advantages in technical capability and cost efficiency. Protect those advantages through compliance systems ensuring your global workforce supports rather than threatens your federal contract portfolio.

Additional Resources

Related Hour Timesheet Articles:

Official Regulatory References:

Hour Timesheet Login – Find Your Login Page

New Login

Each Hour Timesheet account has its own custom domain as part of the login URL. Your login page follows this format:

https://[yourcompanyname].hourtimesheet.com

For example:

ABC Company would login at: abc.hourtimesheet.com
Smith Industries would login at: smithindustries.hourtimesheet.com
Johnson LLC would login at: johnsonllc.hourtimesheet.com

How to Find Your Specific Login Page

Check Your Welcome Email

When your Hour Timesheet account was first set up, you received a welcome email containing your unique login URL. Search your email inbox for:

Subject line: “Welcome to Hour Timesheet”
From: Hour Timesheet or support@hourtimesheet.com

Look at Your Bookmarks

If you’ve previously logged in and bookmarked your login page, check your browser bookmarks for your Hour Timesheet URL.

Ask Your Administrator

Your company’s Hour Timesheet administrator or the person who set up your account will have your unique login URL.

Check Previous Login History

Look at your browser history for “hourtimesheet.com” – your specific subdomain should appear in your recent browsing history.

First Time Logging In?

If you’re a new employee and haven’t received login credentials yet:

Contact your company’s Hour Timesheet administrator
They will provide you with:
- Your company’s unique login URL

Troubleshooting Login Issues

“This site can’t be reached” or “Page not found”

This usually means you’re using the wrong company subdomain. Double-check your company name in the URL.

Forgot Your Password?

Click the “Forgot Password?” link on your login page to reset your password. Password reset emails will be sent to your registered email address.

Can’t Remember Your Username?

Contact your company administrator or Hour Timesheet support for assistance.

Need Help? Contact Hour Timesheet Support

Our support team is ready to help you access your account:

Phone: (888) 780-9961

Email: support@hourtimesheet.com

Support Hours: Monday – Friday: 9:00 AM – 5:00 PM EST

When contacting support, please have ready:

Your company name
Your email address associated with Hour Timesheet
A description of the login issue you’re experiencing

Security Note

Hour Timesheet takes your data security seriously.

Your company data remains separate and secure
Enhanced access control
Better compliance with DCAA and government contracting requirements

Never share your login credentials with anyone outside your organization.

Still Can’t Find Your Login Page?

If you’ve tried the steps above and still can’t locate your Hour Timesheet login URL, please contact our support team immediately at (888) 780-9961 or support@hourtimesheet.com.

About Hour Timesheet

Hour Timesheet is DCAA-compliant time tracking software designed for government contractors and professional services firms. Whether you’re on a 30-day free trial or a long-time customer, we’re here to ensure you have seamless access to your timekeeping system.